Started By
Message
re: Calling It Now - Mizzou Will Upset A&M in College Station for 3rd Straight Yr.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:40 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:40 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I don't think we're an elite program, I just think we're better than Missouri. Because we are.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:40 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Then please stop begging to get your skull caved in.
Coming from the guy that had multiple points shut down yesterday... must have a short memory Klarvtard.
Ohh, and I just smashed another point you made. See my last comment to you.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:41 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Then please stop begging to get your skull caved in.
Wow. I have a really good feeling about the Mizzou/A&M game.
Keep overlooking that game as an easy win against a shitty opponent. I hope to God that the A&M football team does this...
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:41 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
bullshite. Roger thinks so, and he's your spokesman. By the way, Roger, no Mizzou fan said that we were better than A&M. We've acknowledged how good your team is on multiple occasions. However, you have this jizz jar hard on for Mizzou. We enrage you! You seriously have a full on rager for us! It's actually quite amusing. I hope you don't change your ways. You represent the A&M fanbase very well. Go Aggies...SEC's newest elite member. Your football history is outstanding!

Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:41 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
What we are is better than Missouri.
Mighty big statement considering MU has owned Tamu for a decade.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:43 pm to mograyback
quote:
Now add in that our QB will be the healthiest he's been all year, with the rust shaken off and we add a starting o-linemen that has been out all year.. those are some noteworthy things to consider.
You entire argument revolves around the idea that the improvement brought about by Franklin's health and slightly improved play is enough to beat us.
You've gone from an awful, potentially winless in the SEC team to a true .500 caliber team over the past three weeks or so. Instead of beating you like we did Arkansas and Auburn, we may only beat you like MSU (who is considerably better than you, I might add. I'm giving you more credit than you probably deserve with this comparison).
Could Missouri make it close? I suppose, if we have another epic 6 turnover game like we did against Ole Miss. Under any sort of normal circumstance though your improvement won't be nearly enough.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:43 pm to LSUNV
quote:funny you should say that, considering the rest of you coonasses have been taking credit for our win
The arrogance is getting a little thick around here
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:44 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Roger Klarvin
Klarvtard. Way to dance man, way to dance.
You just got smashed on the point you made about Bowling Green and UL vs FLA. So you reach way back in the conversation so you can continue your trolling, well done my retarded friend.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:46 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
You entire argument revolves around the idea that the improvement brought about by Franklin's health and slightly improved play is enough to beat us.
*You're.
And If you've followed along, I believe the addition of a starting o-linemen was also mentioned, but truth is neither here nor there. This is your world.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:49 pm to mizzoukills
quote:while not being on par with the alabamas, notre dames. USCws, michigans, tennessees, etc, we are definitely a major program from a historical standpoint. only an idiot would think otherwise
Your football history is outstanding!
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:50 pm to mograyback
quote:
Mighty big statement considering MU has owned Tamu for a decade
And what in the wide world of frick does that have to do with this year? Missouri beating us in 2007 or 2010 has no more merit than A&M beating you in 2006. It's a new year with a new team, new staff and new ideas about what is expected of this program both interally and externally.
If we're talking historically, A&M has had considerably more success than Missouri in the last 50 years. Mizzu has one conference title and three divisional titles in that time. A&M has ten conference titles and three divisional titles. A&M has won almost 60 more games in that span despite our recent struggles. We have twice as many consensus all-americans.
Either way, this year or historically, there's no real comparison. You have to go back to our days as a service academy to make them comparable.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:55 pm to juff
quote:
Mizzoukillz just owned you Roger. Be a man about it. Acknowledge it and move it. Ask him not to bookmark it too.
Except his "burn" was on the basis that I believed A&M is an elite program, something I not only never said but disagree with entirely.
Anybody can own you if they just make shite up and put words in your mouth.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:56 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
And what in the wide world of frick does that have to do with this year? Missouri beating us in 2007 or 2010 has no more merit than A&M beating you in 2006. It's a new year with a new team, new staff and new ideas about what is expected of this program both interally and externally.
If we're talking historically, A&M has had considerably more success than Missouri in the last 50 years. Mizzu has one conference title and three divisional titles in that time. A&M has ten conference titles and three divisional titles. A&M has won almost 60 more games in that span despite our recent struggles. We have twice as many consensus all-americans.
Either way, this year or historically, there's no real comparison. You have to go back to our days as a service academy to make them comparable.
I love my double standard aggies.
When you tell them they are 76-37 vs The UT. They immediately say in recent times the record is closer.
But when the shoe fits, they like to use full history (as Klarvtard just did).
Glad you won those titles in the SWC. Who was in that league by the way? You had one, maybe two schools on your level in that league, the rest were little chumps.
And I see you've now totally ignored how stupid your point about Bowling Green and UL vs FLA was... nicely played.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:59 pm to mograyback
quote:
FLA had more total offense in both of those games.. but yeah they dominated them like MU did. You're literally a full retard.
ULaLa led Florida almost the entire final third of the game and Florida needed a last minute miracle to win.
Bowling Green was a tipped pass away from the winning touchdown in the closing minutes.
Mizzu never led past the 9 minute mark of the third and was throwing hail marys at the end.
The turnover margin was 4-1 in Florida's favor. You had more penalties than them. Your starting back averaged 1.9 YPC. Dominance? Please.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:00 pm to mograyback
Well this thread gave me a headache... Less talk, more action.
C Note bet with any Mizzou fan on here. Straight up. No points, no excuses. Call me out, and I'll share contact info.
C Note bet with any Mizzou fan on here. Straight up. No points, no excuses. Call me out, and I'll share contact info.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:03 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
ULaLa led Florida almost the entire final third of the game and Florida needed a last minute miracle to win.
Bowling Green was a tipped pass away from the winning touchdown in the closing minutes.
Mizzu never led past the 9 minute mark of the third and was throwing hail marys at the end.
The turnover margin was 4-1 in Florida's favor. You had more penalties than them. Your starting back averaged 1.9 YPC. Dominance? Please.
22 first downs to FLA 11 and more total yards. FLA had two big plays on offense, other than that they could do nothing against our defense.
Neither Bowling Green or UL out gained FLA.
And I think the 4-1 turnover margin was touched on, our qb hadn't started in a month.. he was rusty as hell. Had it not been for that rust, you're looking at a 2 TD win.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:03 pm to mograyback
quote:
When you tell them they are 76-37 vs The UT. They immediately say in recent times the record is closer.
Except you clearly don't pay much attention, because Texas has dominted us over the last ten years too. A&M is talking about the time since we stopped being a required service school in the 60s, the exact same time frame I'm using for you.
A&M is close to .500 against Texas over the last 50 years (23-27 I think) which is not nearly as skewed as the total record accumulated while we were a small all-male school where all of of our players were required to serve their country after graduating. And that is the same time frame I'm using for you.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:05 pm to mograyback
quote:
Had it not been for that rust, you're looking at a 2 TD win.
Had it not been for Manziel's first career start and a perfectly thrown tipped pass A&M is 10-0.
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:06 pm to AggieJohn06
quote:
AggieJohn06
quote:
C Note bet with any Mizzou fan on here. Straight up. No points, no excuses
Seriously, you're one of those guys? Seriously? Wow...all I can do is shake my head and laugh...

Full on Aggy retards with raging ragers for Mighty Mizzou!
Hill fricking Larry arse
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:07 pm to Roger Klarvin
Let me save you all a lot of trouble....
Mizzou has beat ONE FBS team with a winning record this year...and that team is in Conference USA.
END OF STORY.
All the rest of the B.S is irrelevant.
Mizzou has beat ONE FBS team with a winning record this year...and that team is in Conference USA.
END OF STORY.
All the rest of the B.S is irrelevant.
Popular
Back to top
