Started By
Message
re: Bob Stoops Butthurt
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:14 pm to gateway2mizzou01
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:14 pm to gateway2mizzou01
personally I think he's into some kinky shite.
0
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:14 pm to DMagic
Or Florida beating Oklahoma in the NCG
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:14 pm to UMTigerRebel
He's probably an OK State grad and he's mad we beat them twice with their two best coaches in school history
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:16 pm to DMagic
quote:
Also he neglects to mention that that particular OM team rolled TT in the bowl game LOL
Pretty sure that was Mike Leach, not TT
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:16 pm to beachreb61
Texas Tech brah not Pine Box
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:18 pm to TupeloReb
quote:
Or Florida beating Oklahoma in the NCG
After losing 3 national title games, 2 of them to SEC schools, you'd think Stoops would realize why his team and his conference suffer from a lack of respect.
They let USC hang 55 on them.
Oddly enough, the one BCS title game Oklahoma won was the game they scored the least number of points.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:20 pm to texasaggie08
An average aTm team. Hhahahahaha! This entire article is embarrassing. I was embarrassed for Stoops and the hack who wrote this piece. fricking trash right there.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:22 pm to DMagic
Gotcha. 
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:34 pm to DMagic
Yes he is.
They became 1-A in 2008, and were full members and eligible to play in bowls in 2009.
quote:
Or the one where it says the Wildcats lost in overtime to I-AA Western Kentucky.
They became 1-A in 2008, and were full members and eligible to play in bowls in 2009.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:35 pm to beachreb61
I think hes just mad his little brother gets to coach an SEC team. If I was Mark Stoops I'd give him some shite about the cheap shots on my new team. Kiss my arse Bob! 
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:36 pm to DisplacedKentuckian
quote:
They became 1-A in 2008, and were full members and eligible to play in bowls in 2009.
Let alone them and Willie Taggart had a pretty great team and Kentucky was at an all time low.
This post was edited on 5/7/13 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:41 pm to DisplacedKentuckian
Yea, the writer is a complete idiot. I notice not one mention of Kansas and their powerhouse football program.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:42 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
41-13 didn't sort this out?
Doesn't fit in to their narrative. Big 12 Champions getting steam rolled by the Aggies is something they don't want to acknowledge happening. Truth is... in Bob Stoops last 4 games, count em, 4 games against the SEC, he hasn't scored more than 14 point. Granted, he did win one of those games, but it was against Arkansas, and is Arkansas even really SEC worthy?
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:44 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
41-13 didn't sort this out?
Doesn't fit in to their narrative.
Bingo.
And in the SipSpin10, narrative is EVERYTHING.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:45 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Arkansas even really SEC worthy?
BURN!
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:47 pm to DMagic
quote:
He's probably an OK State grad and he's mad we beat them twice with their two best coaches in school history
you'd think he would choose another team to use as an example. Ole Miss has fared well against Big 12 bowl opponents.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:50 pm to texasaggie08
It's sad when the big12awhileago has to fight their perception of inferiority in their regional publications.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:55 pm to texasaggie08
It truly amazes me how when people ask the B12, B10, or Pac12 how they can overcome the SEC dominance, and they always bring up, "well how are the bottom teams doing?"....
It's embarrassing. No one ever thinks of the bottom teams in the conference when they ask about the national title-winning teams of the SEC. It's always whoever the #1 team in the SEC is every year, regardless of who it is. THAT'S the team(s) that the other conferences are struggling to match, and they respond by asking about the SEC's bottom 6 as if it's some proper response???
It's embarrassing. No one ever thinks of the bottom teams in the conference when they ask about the national title-winning teams of the SEC. It's always whoever the #1 team in the SEC is every year, regardless of who it is. THAT'S the team(s) that the other conferences are struggling to match, and they respond by asking about the SEC's bottom 6 as if it's some proper response???
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:57 pm to UMTigerRebel
Now do you guys see why A&M and Mizzou fans like to rail on the Big 12 so much?
No conference has more of a reactive approach to PR than these clowns.
No conference has more of a reactive approach to PR than these clowns.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:58 pm to ConwayGamecock
quote:
It truly amazes me how when people ask the B12, B10, or Pac12 how they can overcome the SEC dominance, and they always bring up, "well how are the bottom teams doing?".... It's embarrassing. No one ever thinks of the bottom teams in the conference when they ask about the national title-winning teams of the SEC. It's always whoever the #1 team in the SEC is every year, regardless of who it is. THAT'S the team(s) that the other conferences are struggling to match, and they respond by asking about the SEC's bottom 6 as if it's some proper response???
I love that little excuse.
Even better are the "well, it's really only Alabama winning" people.
UGA probably would have beaten notre dame WORSE had they beaten the Tide in ATL. And they damn near did.
Page 2 of 17
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News