Started By
Message
re: Better in the NFL: Cam Cameron as an O/C or Saban as a HC
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:34 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:34 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Look it up and do the math, LSU called a larger percentage of run plays in 07 than they have in years since.
whats your point? its been about 60/40 run/pass at LSU for as long as i can remember
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:35 pm to cas4t
quote:
Just another troll. Nothing to see here. Move along guys.
I'm not trolling. I'm being honest. That dude's sentence construction is shite. I couldn't understand a one-sentence post he wrote.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:35 pm to cas4t
quote:
Did you answer my question?
It doesnt need answering because it is irrelevant. We turned the ball over, your offense scored on short fields. LSU won because of their good defense and our offensive mistakes. Without that, they score what? Maybe 10 points? Maybe 250 total yards?
If LSU had a poorer defense, or if we dont turn it over, we win in a blowout keeping LSU's offensive production and ability constant.
This post was edited on 2/8/13 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:36 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
I'm not trolling. I'm being honest. That dude's sentence construction is shite. I couldn't understand a one-sentence post he wrote.
Sometimes you can be honest and troll at the same time. Exhibit A is above, just a few posts.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:36 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
Why don't you just tell us why he was fired/canned/sacked/let go/terminated/downsized from B'more?
because he called out Harbaugh on overriding his plays in front of the players
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:37 pm to cas4t
quote:
Sometimes you can be honest and troll at the same time.
I don't think you know what trolling is. You should go look it up.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:37 pm to BamaNixon
You know you're losing an argument when you resort to pointing out grammar mistakes. 
This post was edited on 2/8/13 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:38 pm to Choctaw
quote:
whats your point? its been about 60/40 run/pass at LSU for as long as i can remember
The one year it was 70/30 you actually backed into the NC-game and won it, but some of your fan base wants more passing.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:38 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
t doesnt need answering because it is irrelevant. We turned the ball over, your offense scored on short fields. LSU won because of their good defense and our offensive mistakes. Without that, they scored what? Maybe 10 points? Maybe 250 total yards?
Again, our O manages to NOT turn the ball over, yet they had little to do with the win? So if LSU had turned it over, say, 3 times, would aTm have won? Probably. Hence, our O played a very big role in winning that game by not turning the ball over.
And by scoring more points than aTm's O.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:39 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
but some of your fan base wants more passing.
Our fan base wants more EFFECTIVE passing. We love the fact that we can run the ball at will.
This post was edited on 2/8/13 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:40 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
DaleDenton
Why are you even posting in this thread..?
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:40 pm to Choctaw
quote:
because he called out Harbaugh on overriding his plays in front of the players
You're going to have to give me a link on this, because everything I'm reading says that it was because their offense was expected to be great and, instead, was ranked 18th in the NFL. I'm not calling you a filthy, mealy-mouthed liar, but I'm also not taking a filthy, mealy-mouthed liar's word for it without a link.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:40 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
The one year it was 70/30 you actually backed into the NC-game and won it
do you enjoy pulling things out of your arse?
in 2007 it was 58/42 run/pass
This post was edited on 2/8/13 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:40 pm to cas4t
quote:
So our O didn't have much to do with it, but they scored more points than aTm's O, AND managed to not turn the ball over.
Like I said, if NOTHING changed about LSU's offense in that game (playcalling, production, turnovers, etc.) the game is a blowout for A&M if you take out the turnovers. Any logical person can obviously conclude from this that LSU's offense was a minimal factor.
Before A&M turned the ball over the first time, we were driving up 12-0 with six minutes left in the 2nd quarter and had gained over 250 yards to LSU's 80. Had things kept going that way, we would have blown you out. Why didnt we? Turnovers.
LSU's offense was poor all day.
This post was edited on 2/8/13 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:42 pm to BhamBengal
quote:
You know you're losing an argument when you resort to pointing out grammar mistakes.
That might be true if I were pointing out grammar mistakes, but that's not what I'm doing. I'm commenting on the fact that I found your sentence utterly unreadable. I mean, I understood each of the words, but the way you threw them together was wholly improper.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:45 pm to Roger Klarvin
Yet they scored more points that day. Hmm..just 3 points from ST.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:45 pm to BamaNixon
Find something to do with your time, instead of trolling an SEC sports website
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:46 pm to Choctaw
quote:
because he called out Harbaugh on overriding his plays in front of the players
Is this the new LSU spin?
The Baltimore Sun, crediting unnamed sources, cited the Ravens' inconsistency on offense and quarterback Joe Flacco's development, of which the team hasn't seen significant progress.
quote:
Baltimore's running game ranks 17th in the NFL despite the presence of Pro Bowl running back Ray Rice, who has topped the 100-yard rushing mark only three times (compared to six times last year). Rice led the NFL in yards from scrimmage in 2011.
However, Cameron, who was given a contract extension this past season, was ultimately doomed by a lack of significant progression from Flacco and his failure to establish Pro Bowl running back Ray Rice in several games over the past couple of seasons. Rice’s touches have decreased in each of the past three seasons and he’s currently on pace to have his fewest carries since 2009.
Sure guys, whatever you say.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:46 pm to cas4t
quote:
So if LSU had turned it over, say, 3 times, would aTm have won? Probably.
If A&M hadnt turned the ball over, LSU may not have scored at all regardless of them not turning the ball over. If A&M hadnt turned the ball over, based on results prior to the turnovers, we would have put up over 500 yards and at least 30 points.
That's the difference. Had we not turned the ball over, LSU's lack of turnovers would have only been the difference in them losing by 2 scores and losing by 3-4 scores, and that's being generous seeing as you probably wouldnt have hit double digits without our TOs.
Posted on 2/8/13 at 7:47 pm to Roger Klarvin
Cameron made Saban look like don Shula.
Popular
Back to top


1




