Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:06 pm to TheHat
I don't doubt that LSU has many more years of screwing by the refs coming their way in the state of Alabama. Regardless, at this point I'd love to see AU beat AL.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:06 pm to PurpleArmadillo
quote:
Seriously, the refs were against LSU all night. If you can't figure out why the SEC would pave the way for a FL-AL matchup in the SECC,
if you honestly believe the refs were against lsu and willingly throwing the game risking jail time for cash or to make the conference money then i feel sorry for you.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:07 pm to PurpleArmadillo
quote:
at this point I'd love to see AU beat AL.
Whatever makes you feel better I guess.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:08 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
You know damn well that is EXACTLY the rule that applies.
I know damn well you are, where rule are concerned, a ignorant sonofabitch. Like I said, read the fricking A.R.'s to see what that rule addresses.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:09 pm to arrakis
Still at it huh? Thought you were only in this for your personal entertainment?
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:09 pm to PurpleArmadillo
This is why the play wasn't overturned, IMO.
The officials believe he didn't gain possession until after his left foot came off the ground (I'm not sure if I agree with this or not). Therefore, the catch was contingent on his right foot hitting in bounds.
This is they best angle they had, and it isn't conclusive at all saying his right foot hit in bounds, hence the play not being overturned.
The officials believe he didn't gain possession until after his left foot came off the ground (I'm not sure if I agree with this or not). Therefore, the catch was contingent on his right foot hitting in bounds.
This is they best angle they had, and it isn't conclusive at all saying his right foot hit in bounds, hence the play not being overturned.
This post was edited on 11/9/09 at 10:32 pm
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:10 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
This is they best angle they had, and it isn't conclusion at all saying his right foot hit in bounds, hence the play not being overturned.
His fricking LEFT foot was in bounds with the ball in his hands a few frames before this shot. See the big damn divot ?
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:10 pm to Charles Bronson
As far as Julio touching the ball, he probably did, but I doubt he touched the ball before Peterson.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:10 pm to Charles Bronson
It was a catch...the whole damn country knows it but obviously the few tards here disputing it must be right.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:11 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:Read the entire post, moron.
His fricking LEFT foot was in bounds with the ball in his hands a few frames before this shot. See the big damn divot ?
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:11 pm to lynxcat
That was such an INT.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:13 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
but I doubt he touched the ball before Peterson.
I don't think he did, either, but I also don't think PP had possession, yet, when Julio was out of bounds and was touching it.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:13 pm to jlc05
I've never bought into the Julio touching it argument, I don't even think that played into the discussion.
Just a bad camera angle making it hard to tell 100 percent whether or not there was grass between his toe and the white line and a shite scared review ref who ended up making the safer call.
Granted I thought he picked it. But there have also been some silly arguments (omgz he had three feet down, its called possession and control, or the stupid divot argument).
Anyone who buys into the conspiracy theory argument is a moron. Sorry.
Just a bad camera angle making it hard to tell 100 percent whether or not there was grass between his toe and the white line and a shite scared review ref who ended up making the safer call.
Granted I thought he picked it. But there have also been some silly arguments (omgz he had three feet down, its called possession and control, or the stupid divot argument).
Anyone who buys into the conspiracy theory argument is a moron. Sorry.
This post was edited on 11/9/09 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:14 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:Does this matter?
...PP had possession, yet, when Julio was out of bounds and was touching it.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:14 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
Charles Bronson
Stop making sense....you'll only confuse them.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:15 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
Awww shite...damned computer just ate my response. Maybe those Mac commercials are right. F-it.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:15 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:
when Julio was out of bounds and was touching it.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:16 pm to arrakis
quote:I know... I know...
Stop making sense....you'll only confuse them.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 10:17 pm to Golfer
It looks like Julio ever so slightly has his left fingers on the ball, IMO.
This post was edited on 11/9/09 at 10:20 pm
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News