Started By
Message
re: Bernard’s “Catch” and Sendell’s 1st FG
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:41 pm to Demosthenian
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:41 pm to Demosthenian
quote:
The kick looked good. Period. Fowler barely had a peep after Lemonnier commented.
On Bernard, it was either a catch, and then a fumble, or not a catch (as it was contested the entire way to the ground). Remarkable how there wasn’t even a hint of inquiry to a review from Herbie and Chris.
Tells you all you need to know.
Are you nervous about something? You seem to be nervous.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:53 pm to Demosthenian
Why are you UGA fans such whiny bitches? Any opinion you have about Alabama is so inherently biased its as worthless as tits on a boar hog. Just stfu and sit down.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:55 pm to BamaChemE
quote:Nah. Not how it happened
was a catch, a tackle, and then the ball came out.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:57 pm to Demosthenian
Bernard's catch was a catch. At some point if you said it was a tie, which it wasn't, the tie goes to the receiver.
If you watch the kick virtually no one behind the goalpost in the stands was signaling it was good, and it was obviously wide.
Hope this helps.
If you watch the kick virtually no one behind the goalpost in the stands was signaling it was good, and it was obviously wide.
Hope this helps.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:58 pm to cajunbama
Still claiming injuries after you got arse raped and will again if Bama could make the natty
GA had 3 oline injured in game 1 and still had to have Kirby forego the fg and a dropped td for the win.
GA beat every team on the schedule.
Y’all fricked around and found out
GA had 3 oline injured in game 1 and still had to have Kirby forego the fg and a dropped td for the win.
GA beat every team on the schedule.
Y’all fricked around and found out
Popular
Back to top


0






