Started By
Message

re: Beneficiaries of a 12 Team CFP

Posted on 6/15/21 at 12:04 pm to
Posted by bayoubengals01
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2014
246 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 12:04 pm to
LINK

Link is from Ross Dellinger Twitter..

Seems like just based on appearances Conferences net change for the last 7 years is as follows:

Big 10 +15
SEC +11
PAC +9
Big 12 +8
ACC +3 (bUt wE aReNt ToP HeAvY)
ND +2

*G5 +8
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49264 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

unlikely to get more than 1 team in a year, talented but no team is a clear #2 that would be ranked high enough.

Ohio State is likely to get in most years with other possible teams being Wisconsin, Michigan, and Penn State. Frankly I just want to see a playoff game in a blizzard
This post was edited on 6/15/21 at 12:14 pm
Posted by Slackaveli
Fayetteville
Member since Jul 2017
15163 posts
Posted on 6/17/21 at 4:14 pm to
Arkansas would have been in in both 2020 and 2011.
Posted by 5Wide
Member since Jun 2013
1918 posts
Posted on 6/17/21 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

The margin of error now encompasses the full range of their expected results (at least from what we've seen at this point under Nick). Saban is pumped for sure.



Virus scare + Playoff expansion + NIL + free transfer rule = Saban coaching Bama until he drops dead
Posted by MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Member since Jun 2017
15598 posts
Posted on 6/17/21 at 7:48 pm to
2 G5 champs would've made it last year.

1. Bama
2. Clemson
3. Ohio St
4. OU
5. Cincy
6. Coastal Carolina
7. Notre Dame
8. A&M
9. UF
10. UGA
11. Iowa St
12. IU

I imagine the committee would've flipped A&M and ND to avoid a rematch.

Posted by Woodreaux
OC California
Member since Jan 2008
2790 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 6:12 am to
Playoff Expansion will benefit a handful a individuals who are recognized as having facilitated the expansion. Their individual careers will gain a big administrative coup they can show the next board of investors they want to squeeze.

People will suffer from the expansion are those who enjoy watching good non-conference games in September.

What kind of fricking retard would sacrifice the quality of one third of the season just gain 2 weeks of blowouts in January? That's the trade we'd get.

The 1980 and 1990's Bowl season cluster-fricks were better than what this would become. Splitting the titles IS worth it if that's the only way we keep good football games played.

Posted by SRCnole92
NW Florida
Member since Jun 2021
80 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 7:14 am to
quote:

2019 Bama wouldn't have made the 12 team playoff as it's been presented.


Let's just say the committee probably doesn't rank the teams the same way with 12 spots than they do with 4 playoff spots. You think they drop Florida just one spot after the cleat-yeet if there are 12 seeds?
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15391 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 11:13 am to
quote:

AAC: (their new commissioner is extremely intelligent)
- I included this conference solely on the basis that they’ll finally have a chance to be included. I believe this will garner more revenue towards the conference as a whole. The commissioner is already emphasizing a greater delegation of resources to football in general (and if we are honest) their product is definitely better if not on par with PAC 12. With a better product, comes a better TV deal & with markets in TX, OH, FL I expect the conference to become wealthy fast.


LOL yeah no. Their product is not better than the PAC12. Thats just ridiculous. Their markets in TX, OH and FL are dwarfed by the P5 teams in those respective states.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter