Started By
Message
re: Bammer cheating again
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:34 pm to CC Tiger1
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:34 pm to CC Tiger1
quote:like your dumbass has room to talk when you claim the 83 one....
Watch the video I posted. Bammer claims a national championship for 1941 when they finished in 3rd place in the SEC, and most of the other national championships they claim from the 1920's, 1930's, and 1940's were awarded 15 or 20 years after the fact and often by geologist in their spare time. That is really and truly something to laugh about
just STFU....
2
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:34 pm to TT9
You claim national championships for finishing in 3rd place in the SEC and other national championships that were awarded 15 or 20 years after the fact. It doesnt get much dumber than that. LMAO 
This post was edited on 7/31/09 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:35 pm to TT9
quote:
So who is the stupid ones?
Is this a rhetorical question?
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:36 pm to TT9
Look dumbass, if you are ignorant, just admit it. Otherwise make your fricking case for AU not being the best/most deserving team in 1983 and I will rip it apart. Otherwise STFU.
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:36 pm to TT9
quote:
like your dumbass has room to talk when you claim the 83 one.... just STFU....
To my knowledge 1964 Alabama is the ONLY program in the history of ANY college sport male or female to claim a national championship after losing their final game/match of the season.
MASSIVE FAIL
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:38 pm to bcshog
quote:go away doormat...
To my knowledge 1964 Alabama is the ONLY program in the history of ANY college sport male or female to claim a national championship after losing their final game/match of the season.
MASSIVE FAIL
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:39 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Look dumbass, if you are ignorant, just admit it. Otherwise make your fricking case for AU not being the best/most deserving team in 1983 and I will rip it apart. Otherwise STFU.
You're the one that made the claim that the Barn won a NC in 1983, when they didn't. Now you want us to make our case? The burden of proof is on you.
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:40 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:i'm going by polls retard,god your one dumbfrick..you guys claim that we have questionable titles,Yours is Bogus as frick as well...Yeah Miami>>>>>>>>Cow College anyday in 83...Develop a frickin brain....
Look dumbass, if you are ignorant, just admit it. Otherwise make your fricking case for AU not being the best/most deserving team in 1983 and I will rip it apart. Otherwise STFU.
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:41 pm to CC Tiger1
I'll grant you '41. That claim is straight stupid.
However, prior to 1936 there were no wire service polls. There were a bunch of different selectors, and there was no such thing as a consensus national champion.
Alabama's claims in '25, '26, '30, and '34 are as legit as any other team during that era. And don't bother bringing up the Dickinson System because Dickinson was corrupt and his "system" was weighted against all southern schools, not just Alabama.
'61, '64, '65, '73, '78, '79, and '92 were all wire service championships, unlike Auburn's in '83.
Please quit making yourself look foolish.
However, prior to 1936 there were no wire service polls. There were a bunch of different selectors, and there was no such thing as a consensus national champion.
Alabama's claims in '25, '26, '30, and '34 are as legit as any other team during that era. And don't bother bringing up the Dickinson System because Dickinson was corrupt and his "system" was weighted against all southern schools, not just Alabama.
'61, '64, '65, '73, '78, '79, and '92 were all wire service championships, unlike Auburn's in '83.
Please quit making yourself look foolish.
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:41 pm to Expert
quote:xactly,like talking to my 3 year old nephew.....
You're the one that made the claim that the Barn won a NC in 1983, when they didn't. Now you want us to make our case? The burden of proof is on you.
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:42 pm to bcshog
quote:
To my knowledge 1964 Alabama is the ONLY program in the history of ANY college sport male or female to claim a national championship after losing their final game/match of the season.
quote:
Though some of the math systems selected champions after the bowl games, both of the major polls released their rankings after the end of the regular season until the AP polled writers after the bowls in 1965, resulting in what was perceived at the time as a better championship selection (Alabama) than UPI's (Michigan State). After 1965, the AP voted before the bowls for two years, permanently returning to a post-bowl vote in 1968. The coaches did not vote after the bowls until 1974
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:46 pm to Expert
quote:
You're the one that made the claim that the Barn won a NC in 1983, when they didn't. Now you want us to make our case? The burden of proof is on you.
You frickers laughed at that claim. I think you laugh out of ignorance. I have made the case here before. I wanted to see if one of you had anything to back up dismissal of the claim or if you are just ignorant as I suspect.
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:48 pm to bcshog
quote:
To my knowledge 1964 Alabama is the ONLY program in the history of ANY college sport male or female to claim a national championship after losing their final game/match of the season.
The Tennessee Volunteers were consensus AP and UPI National Champions in 1951. They lost to Maryland in the Sugar Bowl 28-13.
You forget that the AP and UPI used to award their Championships before the bowls. That's what happened with Bama in '64.
But you know who also "claims" that Alabama were National Champions in 1964? The AP and Coaches Polls.
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:48 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
1983
Auburn 11-1 Pat Dye BR, CFRA, NYT, R(FACT), SR
Miami 11-1 Howard Schnellenberger AP, DuS, FN, FWAA, NCF, NFF, SN, UPI, USAT/CNN
Nebraska 12-1 Tom Osborne B(QPRS), DeS, L, MGR, PS, R(FACT), SR
Auburn 11-1 Pat Dye BR, CFRA, NYT, R(FACT), SR
Miami 11-1 Howard Schnellenberger AP, DuS, FN, FWAA, NCF, NFF, SN, UPI, USAT/CNN
Nebraska 12-1 Tom Osborne B(QPRS), DeS, L, MGR, PS, R(FACT), SR
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:50 pm to bamawriter
quote:
But you know who also "claims" that Alabama were National Champions in 1964? The AP and Coaches Polls.
Alabama 10-1 Bear Bryant AP, B(QPRS), L, UPI
Arkansas 11-0 Frank Broyles BR, CFRA, FWAA, HAF, NCF, PS, SR
Michigan 9-1 Bump Elliott DuS
Notre Dame 9-1 Ara Parseghian DeS, FN, NFF
Posted on 7/31/09 at 3:55 pm to bcshog
thats not true. you're just pissed cause your team was left out.
Posted on 7/31/09 at 4:04 pm to angryslugs
quote:
The Tennessee Volunteers were consensus AP and UPI National Champions in 1951. They lost to Maryland in the Sugar Bowl 28-13.
Interesting. And people bitch about the BCS? At least they down crown the bowl loser as the national champions LOL
Posted on 7/31/09 at 4:14 pm to Alahunter
quote:
1983
Auburn 11-1 Pat Dye BR, CFRA, NYT, R(FACT), SR
Miami 11-1 Howard Schnellenberger AP, DuS, FN, FWAA, NCF, NFF, SN, UPI, USAT/CNN
Nebraska 12-1 Tom Osborne B(QPRS), DeS, L, MGR, PS, R(FACT), SR
I know you have seen this Hunter, so I will just give the summary facts on 1983 for the ones that are apparently ignorant of the '83 season.
1.Tied with Mia and Neb for the best record in football (all 1 loss).
2. AU plays the toughest schedule in the nation - 5 top ten teams and 8 top twenty teams and has the number 1 defense in the nation and a backfield with Bo Jackson, Lionel James, and Tommie Aggee (all NFL backs).
3. Nebraska plays 1 top twenty team and loses.
4. Miami plays 2 top twenty teams and goes 1-1 Top 20 teams are - FL which AU beat and Neb who never played a top twenty team all year until Miami who beat them).
Oh yeah, and AU lost the second game of the season to the 3nd best team in the country that year as their only loss - TX. So the losing late does not come into play.
AU also beat a 10-0 UGA in Athens at year end.
Basically AU played one of the toughest schedules in the history of college football and finished tied for the best record in the country. It should have been a no-brainer. Best defense in the country and maybe the best runningback in the country. Their power ranking and strength of schedule was through the roof. From 1980-2000 (when the power ranking and SOS computer calcualtions changed making previous comparisions impossible) only 2 national champions over those 20 years had a higher power ranking than 1983 AU.
LINK
This post was edited on 7/31/09 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 7/31/09 at 4:16 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Bama would have been awarded the Championship on name recognition. tough luck for Auburn being second fiddle.
70 bp point spike with that one.
70 bp point spike with that one.
This post was edited on 7/31/09 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 7/31/09 at 4:19 pm to Alahunter
Nah. Part at the end of the post made me laugh.
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News