Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:20 pm to redfieldk717
quote:
its still a damn assumption and you dont know if the dismissal was dropped do you?
Yes, they're both assumptions. And as I stated, not all assumptions are created equal. Some are more plausible than others.
Are you claiming that his dismissal wasn't dropped? That would be a much bigger assumption on your part than my assuming that his dismissal has not been dropped
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:23 pm to redfieldk717
quote:
im arguing against your logic and defending dre...if you would read my posts i said it was a very good assumption but we could assume the same about dre based on your logic. sorry it went over your head
The whole implication of this thread is that Alabama does not drug test or covers up for players that fail. Robby Green would disagree with you. You can assume that Kirkpatrick has been toasting 'em all year, but there is no proof that he has, and a lack of positive tests does not prove that Alabama is sweeping this stuff under the table. He is apparently smarter in his consumption habits than Mr Mathieu. We don't have to assume that Mathieu's behavioral problem was drugs, since he is in drug rehab, and only a fool would say that isn't related to his dismissal from LSU.
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:24 pm to sarc
i actually know for a fact if he wants to play in 2013, he is welcome back if he meets all of the criteria laid out for him.
his dismissal was because of his reaction to the year suspension, i also know that to be fact
thats if he doesnt go pro
his dismissal was because of his reaction to the year suspension, i also know that to be fact
thats if he doesnt go pro
This post was edited on 8/23/12 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:25 pm to redfieldk717
quote:
its still a damn assumption and you dont know if the dismissal was dropped do you?
Is he back on the team?
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:27 pm to 285exp
well you jumped into a different argument that i was posting to someone else. i agree with you on the implications of the thread, etc
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:28 pm to redfieldk717
quote:
i actually know for a fact if he wants to play in 2013, he is welcome back if he meets all of the criteria laid out for him
May be semantics, but that doesn't really sound like a dismissal to me. Sounds more like a suspension or forced leave of absence.
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:28 pm to 285exp
no, hes suspended
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:31 pm to redfieldk717
You just said he's dismissed. Not to mention Miles said he's dismissed
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:33 pm to sarc
yeah on friday but you dont have a clue what went on behind closed doors after that...dismissal was dropped
miles later said he will not play for lsu in 2012
miles later said he will not play for lsu in 2012
This post was edited on 8/23/12 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:38 pm to redfieldk717
What went on behind closed doors?
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:55 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
Saban, who says his program educates offenders and helps them make better decisions but will ultimately dismiss them if necessary, recalls having a disagreement with NCAA officials about one player who tested positive.
"Based on the success we've had, I asked them to let us manage the guy in our program, like everybody else," he says. "I also said, 'I hope you understand our program is a hell of a lot better than yours because you're not doing anything to help anyone. - Nick Saban'"
Like i said, "in house". After all, St. Nick is above the NCAA rules committee. And, what Bama player has been dismissed for marijuana, as Nick said he would do?
Posted on 8/23/12 at 4:59 pm to bastropbham
quote:
And, what Bama player has been dismissed for marijuana, as Nick said he would do?
Many have transferred following indefinite suspensions (read: dismissed) for violation of team rules. Several were rumored to be the result of failed drug tests. We don't know because just like Miles, Saban doesn't publicize it when a player fails a drug test. I don't think any coach does.
Posted on 8/23/12 at 5:30 pm to bastropbham
quote:
Like i said, "in house". After all, St. Nick is above the NCAA rules committee. And, what Bama player has been dismissed for marijuana, as Nick said he would do?
Robby Green. It's been said multiple times in this thread.
Posted on 8/23/12 at 6:08 pm to bastropbham
damn this thread is full of win... i'm pretty sure i'm the only one here who has actually taken a piss test for the alabama athletic dept and/or ncaa. no they are never announced they just show up at practice. for us they normally found us in the morning when we were doing weights or other dry land training. i don't think they ever came to the pool to test us.
Posted on 8/23/12 at 6:08 pm to bamafan425
I thought Robby was dismissed for PEDs.
Posted on 8/23/12 at 6:11 pm to bastropbham
quote:
We know you cheat. Me and all my Auburn friends are sure of it.
Posted on 8/23/12 at 7:21 pm to Funky Tide 8
"Well your opinion is worth the dog shite that is on my lawn."
Most Bama opinions aren't worth the fly that's on that shite
Most Bama opinions aren't worth the fly that's on that shite
Posted on 8/23/12 at 7:22 pm to PMPquad47
Posted on 8/23/12 at 7:23 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
"and can figure out that you stop when a drug test is upcoming"
So now you admit they tell players when they are going to be tested? That's even worse.
So now you admit they tell players when they are going to be tested? That's even worse.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News