Started By
Message
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:13 pm to jso0003
Orgeron evaluated very well in his only full year on the trail for us. 13 or 14 sophomores will be starting for us this year.
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:13 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
BAMA fan started rumor bout them trees....how that turn out
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:22 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
AU fans... Have you heard anything about Ed. O?
filling vacant DL coaching spot?
Yaw, yaw, yaw, yaaaaw, yaaaaaw
Yaaaaaw yaaaaaw Wo Eaga!
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:29 pm to jso0003
He's not the best DL coach in the country. Recruiter? Yes
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:42 pm to CarrytheFight
quote:
He's not the best DL coach in the country.
Are you basing this off 1 year @ UT?
Posted on 2/16/11 at 8:46 pm to The White Lobster
quote:
Are you basing this off 1 year @ UT?
Im basing it off the fact that he has never had even close to the best D-line in the country.
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:04 pm to CarrytheFight
quote:
Im basing it off the fact that he has never had even close to the best D-line in the country.
How are you gauging that? Sack numbers?
His Miami lines were dominant, and you can't say 2004 USC's line wasn't great. 2 first rounders, 1 second rounder, and 1 third on that line...
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:05 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
How are you gauging that? Sack numbers?
His Miami lines were dominant, and you can't say 2004 USC's line wasn't great. 2 first rounders, 1 second rounder, and 1 third on that line...
How would you gauge that he is the best?
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:15 pm to CarrytheFight
quote:
How would you gauge that he is the best?
Actually watching them on the field, you can be a great DL without being the NY Sack Exchange or the Fearsome Foursome having 1 person having 20 sacks.
The USC D in 2004 was:
#1 in Rushing D
#6 in Total D
#3 in Fumbles recovered
#2 in sacks
#2 in TFL
#1 in turnovers gained
Just because they didn't have great individual sack numbers, doesn't mean they weren't good at rushing the QB...
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:58 pm to gatordmb89
Trooper will not stand for the competition; O is as dirty as he is or worse. 
Posted on 2/16/11 at 9:59 pm to gatordmb89
Haven't they had enough bad news today ? 
Posted on 2/16/11 at 10:00 pm to Labsolut
quote:
Actually watching them on the field, you can be a great DL without being the NY Sack Exchange or the Fearsome Foursome having 1 person having 20 sacks.
The USC D in 2004 was:
#1 in Rushing D
#6 in Total D
#3 in Fumbles recovered
#2 in sacks
#2 in TFL
#1 in turnovers gained
Just because they didn't have great individual sack numbers, doesn't mean they weren't good at rushing the QB...
Well that proves it then. I stand corrected.
Posted on 2/16/11 at 10:07 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
AU fans... Have you heard anything about Ed. O?
filling vacant DL coaching spot?
That's about right.
Posted on 2/16/11 at 10:12 pm to NashvilleTider
I will shoot yaw-yaw in the balls with a paint gun if I see him recruiting in Louisiana again. 
Posted on 2/16/11 at 10:14 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
he's the best DL coach and recruiter in the nation
He is not the best in either category.
Posted on 2/16/11 at 10:15 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
How are you gauging that?
How about the fact that he had Dan Williams running second team early in the year.
Posted on 2/16/11 at 10:16 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:quote:Actually watching them on the field, you can be a great DL without being the NY Sack Exchange or the Fearsome Foursome having 1 person having 20 sacks.
How would you gauge that he is the best?
The USC D in 2004 was:
#1 in Rushing D
#6 in Total D
#3 in Fumbles recovered
#2 in sacks
#2 in TFL
#1 in turnovers gained
Just because they didn't have great individual sack numbers, doesn't mean they weren't good at rushing the QB...
So you credit the D-Line and the D-Line Coach for everything that the entire Defense accomplished?
Wow! Good One!
This post was edited on 2/16/11 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 2/16/11 at 10:17 pm to CountryVolFan
quote:
He is not the best in either category.
Exactly. The only people who say this are the people who might get him. Otherwise you know better.
How do you spell A-P-R?
Back to top


0




