Started By
Message
re: Anyone else think Auburn beats A&M Saturday?
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:45 am to marshallcotiger
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:45 am to marshallcotiger
Yes because A&M wasn't getting away with holds on 50% of their offensive plays...
1
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:45 am to TeLeFaWx
You're showing me a play that had no flag. What penalty? 
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:45 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
That is cute. I like how you conveniently overlook all the help you received from the refs.
I don't think he is. He's just saying that the refs helped y'all more with that call. I don't get why this bothers you. It doesn't invalidate your win.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:47 am to headrusch
quote:
Yes because A&M wasn't getting away with holds on 50% of their offensive plays...
Auburn got away with holds as well, and a hold is not a loss of down, or a 15 yard swing and an automatic first down. All penalties, or the absence of their application, are not equal. A missed horse collar tackle is far worse than a missed holding call or two.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:47 am to TeLeFaWx
You saying a play at the end of the game had more significance over no calls that helped you score early on, does not make him or you correct.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:47 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You're showing me a play that had no flag. What penalty?
The missed horse collar tackle.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:48 am to TeLeFaWx
Especially a blatant horsecollar when we were driving for the win. Auburn has to cheat to get their first win over A&M. Hope they're proud.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:48 am to TeLeFaWx
Holds that helped aTm score 14 points is pretty significant no matter how you try to spin it.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:49 am to Texas Tea
quote:
Hope they're proud.
Way proud, so proud, giddy with pride.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:50 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
The missed horse collar tackle.
Oh that one. Wasn't significant enough of play to cost you the game.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:50 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You saying a play at the end of the game had more significance over no calls that helped you score early on, does not make him or you correct.
It doesn't make you correct either. If you think missed holding calls equated to the same situational concept of a "bad break". I don't know what to tell you. But again, this doesn't invalidate your win, or mean that Auburn cheated. I don't think the ref purposely missed that call, or any holding calls against either team. Is that what you think we are saying? Auburn won fair and square.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:51 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Holds that helped aTm score 14 points is pretty significant no matter how you try to spin it.
What about holds that helped Auburn score 21?
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:51 am to marshallcotiger
Most of us just wanted the first down we deserved.
Atleast you recognize it should have been called.
That ref saw it clearly but didn't want to decide the outcome and swallowed his whistle.
Atleast you recognize it should have been called.
That ref saw it clearly but didn't want to decide the outcome and swallowed his whistle.
This post was edited on 10/20/13 at 11:54 am
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:52 am to TeLeFaWx
Missed holding calls that resulted in two scores is pretty major. That horse collar was pretty insignificant.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:52 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
What about holds that helped Auburn score 21?
Auburn doesn't hold. wtf are you talking about?
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:53 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Both teams held. Only one team targeted and horsecollared. We're Texas A&M and we're a bit classier than that.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:53 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
It doesn't really matter, it was obvious the better team won. Everything else is just excuses and coping.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:53 am to Texas Tea
quote:
We're Texas A&M and we're a bit classier
OK
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:53 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
RockyMtnTigerWDE
Dude, why are you even wasting your time with that cocksucker?
Your better than that..
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:54 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Holds that helped aTm score 14 points is pretty significant no matter how you try to spin it.
That's a conceptual fallacy. A hold that continues a series, doesn't implicate that the 14 points wouldn't have been scored anyway, and it doesn't mean there weren't holds that happened in the other direction that helped you score points as well, or that a holding no call magically transports the player 15 yards ahead and grants him a first down. All penalties are not created equal. Do you really not get this?
Page 19 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News