Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/12/15 at 6:35 pm to CajunTiger_225
quote:what do you call threatening to sue someone after sending them cease and desist letters for years?
when you could make them stop using it all together.
This post was edited on 11/12/15 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 11/12/15 at 6:35 pm to CajunTiger_225
quote:
I'm talking about the purpose of letting others use it for money when you could make them stop using it all together.
Why cut off a potential revenue stream if they're willing to go through the proper channels and lend due credence to the copyright holder?
Again, the purpose isn't exclusivity--it is proprietary control.
This post was edited on 11/12/15 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 11/12/15 at 6:45 pm to Lonnie Utah
12th man is so sexist. 
Posted on 11/12/15 at 6:52 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Why cut off a potential revenue stream if they're willing to go through the proper channels and lend due credence to the copyright holder?
My entire point. All im saying is I think your administration has their beliefs in the investment of the copyright and not making a tradition exclusive to College Station. Oman has good points though. You just keep telling me I don't understand copyright when I'm just talking about what I think 'the 12th man' means to your administration and west coast is just straight butthurt. Goodness.
Posted on 11/12/15 at 6:55 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
what do you call threatening to sue someone after sending them cease and desist letters for years?
You are so dense.
Why didn't they do the same with Seattle? Maybe because they were willing to throw 150k on it?
Posted on 11/12/15 at 6:55 pm to CajunTiger_225
quote:
and west coast is just straight butthurt
You say a&m is just trying to make money off this. I say give me examples, you say you don't have one but no organization could pay for it like the Seahawks can. I ask what about the colts? And you don't respond. Now I am asking how our actions in regard to this instance points to a&m just trying to make money off it and now I'm butthurt
This post was edited on 11/12/15 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 11/12/15 at 6:55 pm to CajunTiger_225
quote:because it was an infinity different situation 20 years ago. Jesus Christ. If a&m simply wanted to make money off this, why continue to do exactly what you say we should do and tell them to stop? Why wouldn't we just come to them and tell them we were willing to let them use it if they wanted to pay us?
Why didn't they do the same with Seattle? Maybe because they were willing to throw 150k on it?
This post was edited on 11/12/15 at 6:58 pm
Posted on 11/12/15 at 6:57 pm to WestCoastAg
I've told you twice, no, now 3 times that I'm not talking about the Colts and that I understand the situation with the colts.
Brick wall.
Brick wall.
Posted on 11/12/15 at 6:58 pm to CajunTiger_225
So why do you get to use one example to make a completely idiotic assumption but I can't do the same thing?
quote:
Brick wall.
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:03 pm to CajunTiger_225
Do any of you jackasses have any clue how trademark law works?
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:12 pm to WestCoastAg
Are you still talking about the Colts?
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:13 pm to CajunTiger_225
When they are a prime example of how off base you are with you assumption on Texas a&m and how it views the 12th man trademark? Yes
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:14 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
You really think this term means something now?
To you? No it doesn't mean a damn thing, but to Aggies all over the world it has meaning. You don't have to understand it or even like it, honestly we dgaf about whether it means jack shite to you.
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:14 pm to KaiserSoze99
It's not complicated at all. An exclusive binding agreement by law that gives you full right of permissions over said trademark.
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:16 pm to CajunTiger_225
quote:
Why didn't they do the same with Seattle?
We did, why do you think they threw the 150k on it?
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:18 pm to CajunTiger_225
quote:
My entire point. All im saying is I think your administration has their beliefs in the investment of the copyright and not making a tradition exclusive to College Station. Oman has good points though. You just keep telling me I don't understand copyright when I'm just talking about what I think 'the 12th man' means to your administration and west coast is just straight butthurt. Goodness.
Explain this to me. The administration doesn't want to make it exclusive? Since when? How long have their actions reflected this? Are there any circumstances that would make them alter the stance you think they have in any way? And who is the "administration" exactly? The marketing team? Do you know how often that changes?
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:19 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:we are still waiting on this. Apparently because we took money from the Seahawks years ago in an infinitely different situation, it indicates that a&m uses its trademark protection as a money grab. He wants us just to tell people to stop. And even though that's exactly what we are doing right now with the colts, it doesn't matter because apparently he isnt talking about the Colts
Explain this to me. The administration doesn't want to make it exclusive? Since when? How long have their actions reflected this? Are there any circumstances that would make them alter the stance you think they have in any way? And who is the "administration" exactly? The marketing team? Do you know how often that changes?
This post was edited on 11/12/15 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:21 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
we are still waiting on this. Apparently because we took money from the Seahawks years ago in an infinitely different situation, it indicates that a&m uses its trademark protection as a money grab
Ah. Only read the last page. Makes sense. This guy made a really dumb claim and just dug deeper when challenged. Happens all the time from swamp kittens.
Posted on 11/12/15 at 7:23 pm to TeLeFaWx
Yep.He wants us just to tell people to stop. And even though that's exactly what we are doing right now with the colts, it doesn't matter because apparently he isnt talking about the Colts
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News