Started By
Message
re: Aggies -do you think your QB are better off?
Posted on 12/1/17 at 4:46 pm to thelawnwranglers
Posted on 12/1/17 at 4:46 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
seems like Francios would take advantage at the right times
Sure, and I'd argue that Winston was a better QB in the system and he took advantage more without running.
2
Posted on 12/1/17 at 4:49 pm to DFWAggie09
quote:
Sure, and I'd argue that Winston was a better QB in the system and he took advantage more without running.
no argument here
seems like his pro-style can still take spread hs kids and teach them
unlike what was happening at LSU with Miles
Posted on 12/1/17 at 4:51 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
he sure could get them though
He had absolutely no idea what system he wanted.
Look at the quarterbacks Sumlin recruited:
2013 - Kenny Hill (dual threat), Kohl Stewart (pro-style)
2014 - Kyle Allen (pro style)
2015 - Kyler Murray (dual threat), Jake Hubenak (pro-style EMERGENCY)
2016 - Nick Starkel (pro style)
2017 - Connor Blumrick (?), Kellen Mond (non-throwing)
Posted on 12/1/17 at 4:51 pm to DFWAggie09
quote:
and he took advantage more without running.
ISWYDT
Posted on 12/1/17 at 5:20 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
better athlete than Starkel I hear, but he's behind him and needs a ton more reps. If he passes him it will be based on physical development.. saw a pic of Blumrick after one year in program and he's added good mass well ahead of Starkel.
Everyone talks about missing out on Allen, Murray and Stidham.. forgotten is Martell. My kid knows him, he still talks about A&M and what could have been. 100% A&M ran off the Martell commitment, Tate was all in and would inquire were he to transfer.
Having said that.. you dodged a huge bullet, can't have a QB that's the most hated player on the roster.
Everyone talks about missing out on Allen, Murray and Stidham.. forgotten is Martell. My kid knows him, he still talks about A&M and what could have been. 100% A&M ran off the Martell commitment, Tate was all in and would inquire were he to transfer.
Having said that.. you dodged a huge bullet, can't have a QB that's the most hated player on the roster.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 5:23 pm to OldSchoolHorn
quote:
better athlete than Starkel I hear, but he's behind him and needs a ton more reps. If he passes him it will be based on physical development.. saw a pic of Blumrick after one year in program and he's added good mass well ahead of Starkel.
Connor Blumrick tore his ACL very early into his senior year and missed the entire season as a result. He was redshirted this year as a precaution and didn't play in the Spring Game.
He's not just bigger than Starkel, he's also 3 inches taller (6'6).
That man bun though...
This post was edited on 12/1/17 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 12/1/17 at 5:26 pm to thelawnwranglers
How you see LSU QB panning out next year?
This post was edited on 12/1/17 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 12/1/17 at 5:27 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
That man bun though...
Stidham has a tail..
Posted on 12/1/17 at 5:27 pm to OldSchoolHorn
quote:
100% A&M ran off the Martell commitment, Tate was all in and would inquire were he to transfer.
There's no way he and Nick Starkel could coexist after the infamous series of tweets that happened this past summer. ("arse, my dude")
Posted on 12/1/17 at 5:28 pm to TidalSurge1
quote:
How you see LSU QB panning out next year?
uneasy
Love Brennan
why didn't he beat out Etling
Posted on 12/1/17 at 5:29 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
No one can coexist with Martell.. he's as bad or worse than what he projects on social media and the ESPN docs.
He won't last another year at tOSU.
He won't last another year at tOSU.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 5:45 pm to OldSchoolHorn
Gunnell is the QB of the future, and Fisher recruited him as well. The guy is going to be damned good, and have a lot of talent around him
Starkel will do just fine in the meantime
Starkel will do just fine in the meantime
Posted on 12/1/17 at 7:14 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
Johnny football and what I recently watch was that different?
Very.
All spread is not the same.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 7:16 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Sumlin had 3 distinctly different offenses in his time at A&M. Which one are you referring to?
The one that actually had success
Posted on 12/1/17 at 7:44 pm to lsufball19
quote:
The one that actually had success
JFF only had a single year with Kingsbury. Hard to say what could have been had Tubs not ditched Tech opening a spot for Kliff.
I do think Sumlin would still be here had he stayed for 3 or 4 years though. For all of his issues as HC of Tech, he has proven he knows how to pick great QBs.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 7:47 pm to thelawnwranglers
Sumlin never had an offensive identity. He ran a single back clinic I guess, but abandoned that for his current OC. And "single back" is hardly any offensive identity it's so broad. He just did what his OCs wanted.
Posted on 12/2/17 at 7:08 am to TeLeFaWx
Sumlin would still be at A&M if he had just listened to Stidham begging for an offer, not once but twice
Sumlin sucked at managing QB’s
Sumlin sucked at managing QB’s
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News