re: Aaron Murray to join elite company in 2013

quote:

---

wouldn't tahj boyd be in your elite group also?

---

No, he'll only lose 3. They had some blond baseball player start in 2010. We knocked him out of the game though and Tahj played in the 4th.

quote:

---

We understand we are your Super Bowl but life will return to normal sooner than later and we will kick the dogshit out of you every year.

---

I hope you realize Clemson is our yearly Super Bowl. Before SOS, we were very competitive with y'all as well so those days of "kicking the dogshit out of us" on a regular basis are over.

quote:

---

So dramatic, good God...

I completely know that we had an easier schedule the last 2 years, what I am saying is that I knew absolutely zero Dawg fans that cried and cried the years (08 and 09 come to mind) when we had a harder schedule.

Does that make sense?

Historically our permanent opponent (Auburn) is far superior to (Arkansas), it just didn't get brought up because Carolina hasn't been relevant most of their time in the SEC. Now that you are, you are noticing scheduling differences, it doesn't mean that differences in schedules are something new.

---

Let's look at 2008 and 2009, shall we?

2008 ... SCAR played Ole Miss in Oxford. (They finished 9-4 and #14 in the country). The #11 (at the time) LSU at home (they finished 8-5 and unranked) and Arkansas at home (they finished 5-7). We both played eventual national champ UF, we played them in the swamp.

2008 ... Dawgs played Bama at home (Bama finished 12-2 and #6), #15 (at the time) LSU in Baton Rouge (they finished 8-5 and unranked), Auburn at Auburn (they finished 5-7).

So how do you rate Georgia's schedule tougher in 2008 than South Carolina's?

2009 ... SCAR played the #4 team in the country (when we played them) Ole Miss at home, (they finished 9-4 and #20). The #1 team in the country and eventual national champ Bama, at Bama, (they finished 14-0 and #1), at Arkansas, (they finished 8-5 and unranked).

2009 ... Dawgs played @ Arkansas (they finished 8-5 and unranked), the #4 ranked LSU Tigers (at the time) at home (they finished 9-4 and ranked #17), Auburn at home (they finished 8-5 and unranked).

So how is it that you mutts keep claiming you played a tougher schedule in 2009?

I can't wait to read this. No doubt we are about to be completely plastered with some more dawg bullshite.

Now, with regard to comparing Auburn and Arkansas.

South Carolina, since expansion, played Auburn in '96, '97, '05, 06, x2 in 2010 and then again in 2011. Auburn went, during those years, a combined 60-17.

UGA, since expansion, played Arkansas in '92, '93, 2000, 01, 02, 04, 05, 2009 and 2010. Arkansas went, during those years, a combined 57-49-2.

So I think it is safe to say SCAR played Auburn during their best years, would you agree? While, at the same time, Georgia caught Arkansas during their worst years. Yes or no?

to be fair, let's compare Arkansas and Auburn, overall, since expansion, let's look at it this way and see how it pans-out.

Since expansion Arkansas has gone a combined 141-106-2, while Auburn has gone a combined 171-86-1.

So with regard to who has been the tougher permanent opponent from the West, no doubt Georgia had the tougher draw. Auburn has averaged 1.3 more wins a year than Arkansas during that frame of time. And Arkansas has averaged one more loss per year during that frame of time. So it's a two game swing average per season and, while dominant, it is substantial.

Interestingly enough, as a side note, the Auburn vs Arkansas series is dead even at 10-10-1 since expansion with the average score slightly in Arkansas' favor at 24.3 to 23.9 pts per game vs Auburn.

Funny how football works out that way some times.

(Edited to update rankings based-upon objections by Dawg fans below. I used the 2008 and 2009 AP Polls according to the weeks the games were played and then using the final AP Polls from both seasons.)

And the bs penalty on AJ Green.

quote:

---

Funny how you point out that ole miss was 6 when you played them in 2009 and didn't mention that lsu was in the top 5 when we played them.

---

That's fine, mention it. I wasn't following that game that closely so I had no idea - thanks for filling in the blank. (BTW, I just looked and Ole Miss was actually #4 when we played them. LSu was #4 when you played them as well.) I think I went out of my way to track-down final records however, and since you bring it up, Ole Miss beat LSU in 2009 and finished ahead of them in most of the polls. (Although the AP had LSU #17 and Ole Miss #20). Ole Miss also won their bowl game in 2009, LSU did not. So you if you wanna make a point about the rankings at the time they played, that's okay, so long as you are willing to accept the reality of the rest of it. Ole Miss was the better team in '09, they beat LSU heads-up and won their bowl, it is what it is. How any Dawg fan can claim LSU was the tougher opponent that year ... well, lulz, you mutts are killing me - stop it, you're making my ribs ache.

Anyways, so again I ask, how is it that you Dawgs keep claiming that you played tougher SEC schedules both of those years?

quote:

---

But this "UGA had an easy schedule in 2008 and 2009!" stuff is scary

---

Show me where I typed that anywhere or suck my dick.

In other words, either admit you just lied your fricking arse off while trying to make a point, or open wide and prepare for me to skull frick your lying arse.

lulz, "persecution complex?"

And sure, UGA has had some tougher schedules, more often than not SCAR and UGA have both played tough schedules ... but if you will notice, I was responding to someone who claimed UGA played tougher SEC schedules in '08 and '09 ... which UGA did not. But, as predicted, there has since been massive amounts of Dawg bullshite splattered everywhere ... funny stuff, thanks guys.

quote:

---

Under Spurrier we're .500 against y'all and he'll still be here til 2017...

---

Goodness me I hope not. I don't want Steve to Bobby Bowden himself before he comes home.

quote:

---

I've egged this thing on for way too long. I'll simply admit defeat and leave the thread. A few things I need to clear up


-scrooster definitely does NOT ask for oral sex from anonymous internet posters. The posting above where he does so is merely a result of UGA's easy schedule

-UGA has never played a hard schedule in the entire history of college football

-UGA has cheated to have an easy schedule

-scrooster is a martyr on par with MLK, Socrates and Joan of Arc for having to confront these dirty, nasty, cheating schedules every single year of college football's existence

-The University of South Carolina is definitely NOT a backup school for UGA applicants from the Augusta area. UGA simply cheats with all of those GPA and SAT score reports similar to how they cheat to get an easy schedule every year

---

You're leaving the thread because what was a good debate turned into you lying to try to prove your point and you were called on it. You claim to know what I am thinking when, clearly, I typed what I was thinking. You lied and attributed a quote to me, which I typed nowhere in this thread.

If you want to debate like a butthurt beauty queen, then don't enter into debates with me. Don't put words in my mouth and don't lie.

(I readily admit) UGA has played plenty of tough schedules. So you told another lie.

(I readily admit) UGA has, to my knowledge, never cheated to have an easy schedule ...so you told another lie.

"scrooster" (me) is simply offering-up facts, stats, numbers and results to the debate ... claiming me to be a martyr is more beauty queen female drama stuff on your behalf and I have no time or patience or tolerance for drama queens who claim to be psychic and/or clairvoyant who also lie about what is clearly typed right in front of their eyes.

As far as the SCAR is a backup school to UGA, wtf? ... lulz, you've taken it from the ridiculous to the sublime. If this is how you debate your points, by adding absolutely zero accuracy to the debate? Well, you go boy. But grown men are likely to continue to hold disdain for you if you continue to resort to those tactics in life. Regards

(no message)