Started By
Message
re: A&M scored 42, Ole Miss shutout
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:16 pm to TheCheshireHog
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:16 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Your OL isn't even remotely close to being on the same level as A&M's.
I mean ours isn't great, but JFF makes a&ms look way better than it is.
2
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:17 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
You want to give a biased, wrong opinion then then get roasted when you're wrong.
Wrong opinion? How on earth is his opinion of his receivers "wrong," and how was that proven?
[No, I do not want to have this argument on this board again. I didn't participate the first go around for a reason. My point is that your idea of "wrong" isn't really right.]
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:17 pm to reb13
I'm flattered by the A&M fans' obsession with us, but they need to focus on their own problems.
They struggled with fricking Arkansas.
They struggled with fricking Arkansas.
This post was edited on 9/29/13 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:18 pm to reb13
I don't watch a&m games and say wow that o line! I say wow JFF just dodged like 5 defensive players in the backfield.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:18 pm to labamafan
quote:
No way Bama would have shut out ATM but Bamas defense was on another level last night. I don't know if they'll put another defensive game like that together the rest of the year but they looked like our defenses of old and better than last year whose defense was good but not great.
Seriously, it was the best defensive performance I've seen this season. Great athletes playing smart football.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:19 pm to DCRebel
quote:
I mean ours isn't great, but JFF makes a&ms look way better than it is.
You do realize that almost all our OL will be in the NFL. Hell, I'll go ahead and estimate that ALL of them will.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:19 pm to DWag215
quote:
Just because the media asks you a question doesn't mean you have carte blanche to say stupid shite.
You're too goddamn dense to understand that you only think what he said is stupid due to your biases and the luxury of hindsight. You can't say "he said something stupid" as if such a statement can be objectively proven.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:23 pm to DCRebel
quote:
Wrong opinion? How on earth is his opinion of his receivers "wrong," and how was that proven?
Open your damn eyes!
Mike Evans is on pace for almost 1800 yards. You're top 3 WRs combined isn't equal to that? How hard is this to understand. A&M has better WRs. Its clear. Not close. GTFO if you can't see that.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:24 pm to reb13
quote:
I mean ours isn't great, but JFF makes a&ms look way better than it is.
Actually their OL makes JFF look better.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:25 pm to DCRebel
Johnny is the GOAT, their OL is fricking STACKED, best receivers in the history of football, they are NOT Texas' little bro, and Bo Wallace is the dumbest fricking person in the SEC despite playing in the same league as JFF.
Can we all be happy together now?
Can we all be happy together now?
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:26 pm to Farmer1906
A&m has a better qb feeding them the ball. If we had A&M's receivers outside of Mike Evans, Bo would look ten times more terrible than he is
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:26 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Mike Evans is on pace for almost 1800 yards. You're top 3 WRs combined isn't equal to that? How hard is this to understand. A&M has better WRs. Its clear. Not close. GTFO if you can't see that.
I told you I don't want to have this stupid fricking argument again.
The fact is that what he said was the product of his very biased opinion. You can throw all the numbers in the world around, but at the end of the day, if someone says "I think this is better than that," then that's all they need to believe that. That's why opinions aren't usually changed.
Why does it fricking bother you so much? Heaven forbid a quarterback say he thinks he has good receivers (Which he does - we just don't have the system to get them the ball the way A&M does. Mike Evans is a special talent, and I doubt anyone disagrees with that.)
Seriously, why does this bother you so much? Why are you such an insecure little shite about this?
This post was edited on 9/29/13 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:28 pm to DCRebel
Sensitivity issues
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:29 pm to DCRebel
Because its insane.
Its like saying Bo Wallace is better than JFF or Freeze is better than Sumlin.
Its like saying Bo Wallace is better than JFF or Freeze is better than Sumlin.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:30 pm to SwayzeBalla
Get your arse kicked while talking a team 2 weeks away. Now when you get called on it, its "sensitivity". 
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:35 pm to DCRebel
It's stupid to say that OM's WRs are better than TAMU's. We have one guy who's better than your entire corps combined.
The comment is especially stupid when said in response to a question that simply asks how OM's offense sacks up against BAMA's D. There were a million different acceptable ways to answer that question. Bo instead decided to force the stupid comment into his response.
You're acting like what he said was the natural answer. He's now eating his words, which was inevitable.
The comment is especially stupid when said in response to a question that simply asks how OM's offense sacks up against BAMA's D. There were a million different acceptable ways to answer that question. Bo instead decided to force the stupid comment into his response.
You're acting like what he said was the natural answer. He's now eating his words, which was inevitable.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:36 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Its like saying Bo Wallace is better than JFF or Freeze is better than Sumlin.
So? Who fricking cares?
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:45 pm to DCRebel
I'm posting about comments and actual play from players on an SEC Board.
Why don't you just sign off if you don't care
Why don't you just sign off if you don't care
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:46 pm to DWag215
quote:
The comment is especially stupid when said in response to a question that simply asks how OM's offense sacks up against BAMA's D. There were a million different acceptable ways to answer that question. Bo instead decided to force the stupid comment into his response.
Do us all a favor and watch the video of him answering the question: https://www.clarionledger.com/article/20130924/SPORTS030103/309240044/Bold-Bo-Ole-Miss-QB-says-Rebs-can-put-points-No-1-Alabama?gcheck=1
VIDEO
The reporter EXPLICITLY ASKED HIM ABOUT TEXAS A&M. The question was "when you look at what Texas A&M was able to do...what did they do to exploit Alabama's defense?" The answer to the question was completely in context. He said "I don't run around like Johnny" and said that he can't do what Manziel does, but he said that he thinks his receivers are better than A&M's.
You're free to disagree with his opinion about his wide receivers. I don't give a shite if you agree or disagree or whatever, because that's beside the point.
He didn't shoehorn A&M in there. He didn't talk shite about A&M. He didn't bring up A&M for no reason. He was asked a goddamn question and he answered it.
I could see how, without any context, people could think he was being cocky or trying to start something, but in context you'll see that what he said was completely innocuous.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 12:47 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Why don't you just sign off if you don't care
You presume that, on a Sunday afternoon with my allergies wrecking my face, that I have something better to do. I don't. Deal with it.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News