Started By
Message
re: 270 yards passing is why A&M lost!
Posted on 10/25/12 at 9:42 am to TbirdSpur2010
Posted on 10/25/12 at 9:42 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Yeah, I think Sumlin realizes this, but in order to be even moderately successful right out the gate, he had to make do with the players Sherman had recruited to survive a big12 slate.
This.
You have to fit the scheme to the players you currently have. You can migrate to something in the future, but if you try and fit square pegs into round holes, its going to fail.
Posted on 10/25/12 at 11:26 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
I-59 Tiger
This.
From my perspective, it is the conclusion that the gap between A&M and LSU is measured in "galaxies" that drives these threads to 40 pages. I watched the game. I didn't see galaxies. I saw depth at every position for LSU and I saw a little better speed defense. I would not trade a single player on offense.
This game was close, despite 5 A&M turnovers to LSU's 0 and leaving 4 near-certain points on the field with shitty kicking. Some of you ask who would win more if we played the game 10 times? That calls for speculation, but based on this game alone, it wouldn't be lopsided in favor of LSU. I think all 10 games could go either way. Tell me you wouldn't be saying the same thing if you were the losing team in this game.
I can admit all day long that the gap between A&M and Ole Miss very little if anything. The gap between A&M and La Tech very little (as a team). Hell, Auburn and Arkansas have equal or better talent than A&M, but it appears that the use of said talent is the problem.
It's a pride thing, I know. So I am not going to press any of you to admit anything. I will just leave it at that.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News