Started By
Message
re: 22 was the magic number yesterday
Posted on 12/6/09 at 2:36 pm to rbWarEagle
Posted on 12/6/09 at 2:36 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
Not set in stone but it might as well be. I wish we got to play Iowa or Northwestern... so tired of Wisconsin.
We owe them a little revenge imo.
0
Posted on 12/6/09 at 2:37 pm to LSU311Fan
quote:
YOUR TEAM SUCKS AND TEXAS WILL DESTROY YOU AND THE GUMPTARD NATION
Didn't watch the Big 12 Championship Game last night, did ya???
Posted on 12/6/09 at 2:40 pm to Crimsonpanther13
quote:Then you have blinders on...that dude is a freight train. I'm not taking anything away from Ingram, but Gerhart is a beast.
I haven't seen a single highlight of this guy having to break tackles or make any moves on anyone.
Gerhart - 311 attempts for 1,736 yards (5.58 ypc)and 26 TDs
Ingram - 249 attempts for 1,542 yards (6.19 ypc)and 15 TDs
This post was edited on 12/6/09 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 12/6/09 at 3:25 pm to Crimsonpanther13
quote:
I haven't seen a single highlight of this guy having to break tackles or make any moves on anyone.
I've watched them both play in person, and both are absolutely deserving.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 3:25 pm to PanhandleTigah
Those numbers are just sick
Posted on 12/6/09 at 3:29 pm to Ross
quote:did Mcfadden lite up the number 1 defense in america in the sec championship that year? Ingram should win with ease....
Back in 2007, McFadden had a performance against Auburn better than Ingram had against Auburn, but still not that great. That game cost him the award. I expect similiar results for Ingram.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 3:32 pm to PanhandleTigah
Who gives a shite about the Big 12 championship game
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:10 pm to LSU311Fan
quote:You made a statement about how Texas will crush the Gumps. If you'd have watched, you would know Texas sucked arse in that game and were exposed. The Nebraska D basically dominated them most of the game and made Texas look mediocre at best.
Who gives a shite about the Big 12 championship game
If they don't find some offense in the next month, Bama will roll them.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:12 pm to ianrules22
quote:Yep, they sure are. I paid more attention to the PAC 10 this year, and Gerhart is the real deal. Again, not hatin' on Ingram because I believe he is special. I just think overall, Gerhart is the man.
Those numbers are just sick
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:20 pm to PanhandleTigah
those pac10 run defenses are top notch 
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:24 pm to NBamaAlum
They should be playing the Wildcats of Northwestern, I'd think...
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:30 pm to PanhandleTigah
quote:
Gerhart - 311 attempts for 1,736 yards (5.58 ypc)and 26 TDs
Ingram - 249 attempts for 1,542 yards (6.19 ypc)and 15 TDs
So, Gerhart is sick because he has 62 more carries for 194 more yards? Let's finish with Ingram's stats.
Ingram 1542 rushing and 15 TD's
Ingram 30 receptions for 322 yards and 3 TD's
Ingram totals 1864 yards and 18 TD's.
Gerhart has another 149 yds on 10 receptions for a total of 1885 yds.
Ingram has gotten more yardage on less touches than Gerhart has. Not taking away from Gerhart at all, he's got more TD's, but other folks wanting to make out he's so much more of a beast than Ingram is buying into false hype.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:32 pm to PanhandleTigah
The difference between Gerhart and Ingram is that Ingram put up great numbers against top notch defenses. Gerhart is good but he didn't put up 246 against a good USCe D and 189 total yards against the number 1 D. UF had only allowed 3 rushing TDs all year and Ingram had that in one game.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:51 pm to rolltide1283
how many rushing TDs do other Stanford RBs have though?
I think TR has like 5 or 6 and upchurch has a couple. Not that that makes ingram BETTER, but it is a good reason why he doesn't have quite as many TDs
I think TR has like 5 or 6 and upchurch has a couple. Not that that makes ingram BETTER, but it is a good reason why he doesn't have quite as many TDs
Posted on 12/6/09 at 5:00 pm to BamainCFL
Geez, Chill...I'm not insulting Ingram or his abilities - to the contrary - I think Ingram is a special back. The only point I was making is Gerhart basically carried his team, unlike Bama who is loaded with offensive weapons.
The good part is this last weekend probably shut down the campaigns of Tebow and McCoy (hopefully). And it should be a close race between Ingram and Gerhart.
The good part is this last weekend probably shut down the campaigns of Tebow and McCoy (hopefully). And it should be a close race between Ingram and Gerhart.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 5:01 pm to BamainCFL
quote:
how many rushing TDs do other Stanford RBs have though?
I think TR has like 5 or 6 and upchurch has a couple. Not that that makes ingram BETTER, but it is a good reason why he doesn't have quite as many TDs
That's the biggest difference: Ingram gets to rest while his backups play extensively. Gerhart doesn't.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 5:04 pm to iCardinal
quote:That was the point I was making above...thanks.
That's the biggest difference: Ingram gets to rest while his backups play extensively. Gerhart doesn't.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 5:13 pm to PanhandleTigah
I wasn't trying to bash gerhart or anything, just saying ingram gets a lot taken away cause the team is so good.
i'll take a good team with a NC over a ok team with a heisman anyday though.
i'll take a good team with a NC over a ok team with a heisman anyday though.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 5:15 pm to BamainCFL
quote:
I wasn't trying to bash gerhart or anything, just saying ingram gets a lot taken away cause the team is so good.
i'll take a good team with a NC over a ok team with a heisman anyday though.
Completely agree!
Posted on 12/6/09 at 6:14 pm to PanhandleTigah
Both would be the shite though.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News