Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/24/12 at 11:07 am to Oizers
quote:
Note: This is based on talent, returning starters and skill. It’s not necessarily based on stats.
That kind of explains things. If you're going to use all those other categories, stats should probably qualify as well.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 11:07 am to Stonehog
quote:
They're just assuming Mettenrapist will be really good, but no one knows that yet. This is pure conjecture, and it's worth less than a truckload of dead rats in a tampon factory.
its nothing to get upset about
Posted on 8/24/12 at 11:09 am to Choctaw
Why don't you throw in a U Mad for good measure.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 11:32 am to Oizers
well this list is wrong if Bama isn't number 1 2 and 3
signed,
Sir Gumpalicious
signed,
Sir Gumpalicious
Posted on 8/24/12 at 11:33 am to Choctaw
Arky posters always so mad
Posted on 8/24/12 at 11:37 am to 228Tiger
quote:
Arky posters always so mad
Wanna fight about it?
Posted on 8/24/12 at 11:40 am to Oizers
its a bit premature to think that 1 player bumps LSU up to #2 offense when he has like 11 college snaps under his belt. he could be a total bust, a pick-six machine. jarett lee was a competent qb in every game till bama started hitting him, then he lost his nerve completely.
Posted on 8/24/12 at 11:41 am to blacknblu
Fifth for Arkansas seems a little low, and 2nd for LSU when they are starting a new QB seems high, but eh, it's just some dude's opinion.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News