Started By
Message
ESPN/CBS numbers = $28.5 million/yr per school
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:02 am
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:02 am
LINK
One sports television source not directly affiliated with the SEC or the deal estimates an eventual worth of around $400 million per year in SEC television revenue from ESPN and CBS (which pays $55 million per year). That'd be $28.5 million per team before factoring in bowl game earnings or NCAA credits.
One sports television source not directly affiliated with the SEC or the deal estimates an eventual worth of around $400 million per year in SEC television revenue from ESPN and CBS (which pays $55 million per year). That'd be $28.5 million per team before factoring in bowl game earnings or NCAA credits.
11
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:03 am to TigerMattSTL
Mizzou should only get $4mil
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:03 am to TigerMattSTL
quote:
not directly affiliated with the SEC or the deal estimates
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:03 am to TigerMattSTL
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:03 am to TigerMattSTL
I'll wait until everything is official
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:04 am to TigerMattSTL
That's a little lower than I expected
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:05 am to TheWhizzinator
quote:
Mizzou should only get $0 mil
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:07 am to Dro
Why? We bring more TVs than you do. 
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:07 am to TheWhizzinator
quote:
Mizzou should only get $4mil
Why so much?
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:08 am to Mullen3:16
Who are you? The Major Domo of expecting shite? Who cares. If each team gets $1.00 its $1.00 more than if we didn't have it.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:11 am to TheWhizzinator
quote:
Mizzou should get booted from the SEC
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:19 am to FlukerFlakes
So much for southern hospitality.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:21 am to artompkins
What if I am? Sorry you have a stick lodged in your arse this morning
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:23 am to TigerMattSTL
quote:
sports television source not directly affiliated with the SEC or the deal
Ok then.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:24 am to TigerMattSTL
quote:
That'd be $28.5 million per team
Would a stipend to athletes on revenue producing teams be too much to ask, or is this the 'slippery slope'? Are we already on the slippery slope and just not honest about it (specifically referencing the NCAA and the powers that be)? Is a full ride (say 20K a year) sufficient compensation? Is MaryAnn not much much hotter than Ginger?
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:25 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
I'm hoping for ~$37.5 million, or somewhere in that range.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:29 am to TigerMattSTL
quote:
One sports television source not directly affiliated with the SEC or the deal estimates an eventual worth of around $400 million per year in SEC television revenue from ESPN and CBS (which pays $55 million per year). That'd be $28.5 million per team before factoring in bowl game earnings or NCAA credits.
It appears this $$ figure is ONLY for tier 1 and tier 2 rights. After all, money from a SECnetwork certainly would not come from CBS -- nor would it come from ESPN(although the profits would be shared with ESPN)...
There is no way they could estimate the network's worth without knowing the distribution plans or prices yet. If Machen thinks it will be in 30 million homes in the south, that's $30 mil/month and $360 mil/yr just in the SECnetwork(before looking at additional money from around the country). That shows the initial figure to be bogus in and of itself if it is trying to determine total $$ distribution...
This post was edited on 4/16/13 at 11:32 am
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:33 am to dawginar
quote:
Why so much?
Solid question
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:35 am to Mullen3:16
I thought it would be a little higher too. But remember that this is just a starting point. I expect this to rise exponentially.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:36 am to engie
I remember yesterday you were saying 27-30M on tier 1/tier 2 revenue.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News