Started By
Message
re: Teen in Georgia killed, officer related shooting
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:13 pm to MagicCityBlazer
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:13 pm to MagicCityBlazer
300
0
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:31 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
You two are certainly acting like lack of disclosure is damming.
no. you're just drawing conclusions and assuming facts that aren't in evidence. you've been doing this throughout the whole thread
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:36 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
Read what you just wrote and then please never write again.
You two idiots are the ones implying the lack of the brand of gun means there was no gun.
Idiot.
You two idiots are the ones implying the lack of the brand of gun means there was no gun.
Idiot.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:37 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
You two idiots are the ones implying the lack of the brand of gun means there was no gun.
To be clear, I am saying that the paucity of information released with regards to the gun seems to indicate that it is not favorable information for the police department.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:38 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
You two idiots are the ones implying the lack of the brand of gun means there was no gun.
....
You accused someone of assuming something by an assumption.
I don't see how a gun in the trailer means anything necessarily. With all this bad press I almost guarantee that it would have come out if he brandished the gun.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:40 pm to the808bass
Neither of us can possibly know what the policy of GBI is when it comes to the release of information to the media.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:41 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
Neither of us can possibly know what the policy of GBI is when it comes to the release of information to the media.
quote:
Of course you don't.
Unless we have solid proof he was brandishing the weapon it doesn't mean anything. It doesn't justify a shoot on sight policy.
This post was edited on 2/21/14 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:42 pm to MagicCityBlazer
quote:
I don't see how a gun in the trailer means anything necessarily.
Of course you don't.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:48 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
You two idiots are the ones implying the lack of the brand of gun means there was no gun.
Idiot.
dude you suck at reading comprehension. you also suck at logical reasoning.
please continue to draw conclusions and entertain us with your ignorance
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:52 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
Lol. Sure it was a gun. Has no idea the type. Guarantee if it was an actual gun, we would know the brand, caliber and color.
quote:
ndoubtedly if there was a gun it would be in evidence at this time
Derping all over the place.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:55 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
undoubtedly if there was a gun it would be in evidence at this time
do you dispute that statement? do you believe that the authorities left the gun with the victim's family?
Posted on 2/21/14 at 1:57 pm to Rebelgator
LINK
Here's a report from a GBI investigation before it was complete.
Note the "possibly a .380 pistol" in the report. Derp indeed.
Eta: for good measure, a .357 is also mentioned.
Here's a report from a GBI investigation before it was complete.
Note the "possibly a .380 pistol" in the report. Derp indeed.
Eta: for good measure, a .357 is also mentioned.
This post was edited on 2/21/14 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:00 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
do you believe that the authorities left the gun with the victim's family?
In fairness, they seem plenty incompetent.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:00 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
Who said there wasn't one?
I'm just laughing at you morons thinking GBI not disclosing type = no gun.
I'm just laughing at you morons thinking GBI not disclosing type = no gun.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:07 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
I'm just laughing at you morons thinking GBI not disclosing type = no gun.
i never said that. that is the assumption you came to based on your shitty reading comprehension.
i'm just laughing at you coming to asinine conclusions based on misinterpreted statements, and then telling everyone else that they are stupid.
dumbass LEOs like you are the reason we have stories like this one.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:16 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:No chance there was a real gun involved.
do you believe that the authorities left the gun with the victim's family?
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:19 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
You are absolutely implying that.
I'm the youngest person ever to be selected for my unit and I've got 3 years of law school from UF
Of course, I'm arguing with idiots, so I guess I'm wasting my education.
quote:
umbass LEOs like you are the reason we have stories like this one.
I'm the youngest person ever to be selected for my unit and I've got 3 years of law school from UF
Of course, I'm arguing with idiots, so I guess I'm wasting my education.
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:21 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
I'm the youngest person ever to be selected for my unit and I've got 3 years of law school from UF
Why do you seem to believe anything that PD tells you?
This post was edited on 2/21/14 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:23 pm to MagicCityBlazer
I don't. However, these circumstances make perfect sense.
Trailer parks are not filled with the best and brightest
Trailer parks are not filled with the best and brightest
This post was edited on 2/21/14 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 2/21/14 at 2:25 pm to MagicCityBlazer
quote:Obviously his youth begs naïveté.
Why do you seem to believe anything that PD tells you?
Page 16 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News