Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/7/15 at 3:44 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
Nope.
I graduated college.
You'd probably like 3 gun, it's pretty fun.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 3:44 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Neither does a cop
Of course, a cop only needs a great smile and a can do attitude when taking down a drug cartel or gang
Posted on 4/7/15 at 3:45 pm to Agforlife
The law just means you have to buy your guns illegally.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 3:49 pm to Hardy_Har
quote:
The law just means you have to buy your guns illegally.
Actaully here in TX I can posses a firearm in my home and can hunt I just can't transport the rifle to the hunt. The Feds don't agree but as long as I don't walk around with one of my pistols they will ignore the fact I have them unless they just want to be dicks.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 3:50 pm to 5thTiger
quote:
a cop only needs a great smile and a can do attitude when taking down a drug cartel or gang
Which seems to be exactly what you would want an individual to have when someone breaks into their house.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 3:56 pm to Agforlife
quote:
Actaully here in TX I can posses a firearm in my home and can hunt I just can't transport the rifle to the hunt. The Feds don't agree but as long as I don't walk around with one of my pistols they will ignore the fact I have them unless they just want to be dicks.
So, how do they define transport?
Can you be in the car with your gun as long as you aren't driving?
Posted on 4/7/15 at 3:56 pm to 5thTiger
quote:
Of course, a cop only needs a great smile and a can do attitude when taking down a drug cartel or gang
It's okay, gangs won't be allowed to have those guns either.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 4:00 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
, how do they define transport?
Can you be in the car with your gun as long as you aren't driving?
If I understand it correctly, I can't be alone in the vehicle and it must be in a non accessible area, but that is how I read it so to be safe I travel in a completely separate vehicle.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 4:04 pm to wadewilson
quote:
It's okay, gangs won't be allowed to have those guns either
Don't take that approach. That "criminals gonna be criminals" ignorant spat. That's like saying "terrorists are going to be terrorists," like we can't prevent what will happen.
Will it be perfect? heck no. But it shouldn't detract from the goal.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 4:06 pm to Rebelgator
RG,
I heard about these on the radio recently and was curious of your opinion.
Alternative Ballistics
It's basically a condom you put on the tip of your gun to fire a soft shot.
they said they've sold to numerous police departments, but never had one fired in the line of duty.
I heard about these on the radio recently and was curious of your opinion.
Alternative Ballistics
It's basically a condom you put on the tip of your gun to fire a soft shot.
they said they've sold to numerous police departments, but never had one fired in the line of duty.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 4:09 pm to 3nOut
I haven't seen that before.
I don't know how to feel about it honestly. Looks odd.
I don't know how to feel about it honestly. Looks odd.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 4:16 pm to 5thTiger
quote:
Don't take that approach. That "criminals gonna be criminals" ignorant spat. That's like saying "terrorists are going to be terrorists," like we can't prevent what will happen.
And your argument is akin to acknowledging that terrorists hijack planes, but that we should abolish the TSA anyway.
quote:
Will it be perfect? heck no. But it shouldn't detract from the goal.
Your goal is to disarm law-abiding citizens. frick that.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 4:17 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
. Looks odd.
because it's a condom.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 4:28 pm to wadewilson
quote:
And your argument is akin to acknowledging that terrorists hijack planes, but that we should abolish the TSA anyway
No. My idea is to taking measures to prevent a certain event from happening. In fact, my argument is like upping the ante of the TSA.
The goal is to have a safer country. You are too busy looking at one tree to look at the forest.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 4:45 pm to 5thTiger
quote:
The goal is to have a safer country. You are too busy looking at one tree to look at the forest.
And how does removing guns from people who will never break laws with them accomplish that?
Posted on 4/7/15 at 5:27 pm to Masterag
quote:
And to what degree would one need to know guns in order to be a legit advocate for gun control in your opinion?
Knowing the actual definition of an assault rifle would be a good start.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 5:32 pm to 5thTiger
quote:
There is no need for a US citizen to have an AK-47. It is one example of a "high powered rifle"
An AK isn't a high-powered rifle.
Posted on 4/7/15 at 6:16 pm to Roger Klarvin
Probably thinks this is a high powered rifle
When it's a shotgun
When it's a shotgun
Posted on 4/7/15 at 7:32 pm to 5thTiger
quote:
In fact, my argument is like upping the ante of the TSA
You want to add more scrutiny to our day to day lives?
IRS, FBI, NSA, ATF, TSA, EPA, FDA, CIA, Local Police, State Police and County Sherrifs. Sure, we need more people checking on what we are doing. Why don't you just move to Canada?
Page 9 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News