Started By
Message
Posted on 2/19/14 at 5:53 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
I'm watching the Gatorade Duels tomorrow.
It is debatable how much black there actually is to be beaten off
Posted on 2/19/14 at 5:53 pm to deltaland
quote:
That's not entirely true. If you do your history research there was hatred brewing over many more issues than just the slave issue. For one example, the Federal Government was handing out tax breaks to the North which was enabling it's industrial revolution while Southern states were being left behind due to higher taxation and tariffs on Southern ports. Congressional representation was heavily in the Norths favor and the South felt they weren't getting a fair say.
The major impetus was midwestern farm owners angry that they couldn't compete with southern plantations. The primary issue was the federal government's ability to ban slavery. It was an issue that had been brewing for years. The economic implications for the powers in the South were unquestionably terrible on all fronts. Things like industrial tariffs were minor issues and didn't speed up secession.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 5:54 pm to TbirdSpur2010
That's how I picture you.

Posted on 2/19/14 at 5:55 pm to genro
quote:
Why are you directing that at me?
Posted on 2/19/14 at 5:57 pm to deltaland
quote:
it wasn't until 1863...3 years into the war, that slavery was abolished by Lincoln and made an issue of the war. It was a move he did large in part to rally the Northern troops because they were getting weary and losing battles and moral was shifting towards the idea that they had nothing to fight for.
Texas couldn't be allowed in to the United States for over a decase because it would tilt it in to slave states favor... Texas joined the Union in 1845. Slavery was very much at the forefront of United States politics the entire time.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:00 pm to genro
quote:
frick Rebelgator. He is a racist whiny little fig from a racist whiny little fig school.
quote:
genro
teach us your ways of tolerance and wisdom, count.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:00 pm to deltaland
On a related issue, how many years of Texas History do they teach y'all by the time you graduate high school? Should be at LEAST 3 years.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:02 pm to TeLeFaWx
At least 3 years of Texas history should be required in all public schools, imo
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:03 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
At least 3 years of Texas history should be required in all public schools, imo
Would support a Constitutional Amendment that declared this.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:04 pm to genro
Mad, at you, flipper? No. Just laughing at your hypocrisy.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:06 pm to Gradual_Stroke
Private school attendance would triple. 
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:07 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
At least 3 years of Texas history should be required in all public schools, imo
Support.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:08 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
At least 3 years of Texas history should be required in all public schools, imo
Agreed
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:09 pm to Rebelgator
If y'all are gonna force us to be a state instead of our own country, then y'all should have to learn about the greatest Republic North America has ever known.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:11 pm to Gradual_Stroke
Popular
Back to top


1









