Started By
Message

re: How Do White People From Alabama Feel About "Selma" Here?

Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21638 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:09 pm to
I was talking about the movie and what happened in the past and wondered how white people in Alabama felt about a history that is pretty difficult. It is pretty obvious what I am talking about. Not sure why you are so frustrated.

Is this off limits? I saw the movie and it caused me to wonder how white natives of Alabama thought about this and I thought it would be a good discussion. I am neither trolling nor am I a racist.

You, however, are acting either willfully ignorant or you are actually ignorant. Either way, it is ignorance that is coming out.

There have been some good comments in this thread and I have learned a lot - especially from those who are from Selma. You, on the other hand, have added nothing except being frustrated, and I am not quite sure why.

The history is what it is. How does it make you think about the past in Alabama. Real simple. Stop trying to over complicate it.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

What is so "interesting" about it, except that I am getting similar responses there as here?


How so? I haven't seen anyone in this thread calling anyone ignorant, nor have I seen them sink into expletives and telling others to frick off.

quote:

I am pretty surprised by how much hostility some people have to talking about what happened in the South back then in regard to Race


I haven't seen any of that in this thread hardly. If anything.. it's indifference. If that brings animosity, it's from your point of view.

quote:

I am interested in it


Ok.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 1:24 pm
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62564 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:23 pm to
There's no overcomplicating it. This is a fact: Statements and questions likes this
quote:

Why did white people in the past act that way?

Why was it so difficult for them to listen to and grant what King and others were asking for? 
quote:

by how white people treated black people. 


show that you have an untrue, simplistic vision of history - basically that it was the good underdog black people fighting for justice against evil white racists. Or something like that.
quote:

I am asking how you see your own history or how your view of the past in Alabama is affected by how white people treated black people. 
This is a question that can't be answered. Our past is not affected by the way white people treated black people. It's affected by the way everyone treated everyone.

I am not angry. I am letting you know your question is stated from a place of extreme ignorance. You need a lot of education that I can't give you on a message board. As mentioned, read authors from the time period. Reconstruction would be a good place to start.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 1:32 pm
Posted by guschamp84
St Marks Florida
Member since Dec 2014
718 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:50 pm to
ISWYDT
Posted by guschamp84
St Marks Florida
Member since Dec 2014
718 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:52 pm to
I thought you were raised on an Israeli Kibbutzim?
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62564 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 1:58 pm to
I'm a paleoconservative hippie
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21638 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 2:36 pm to
Thank you, Genro. Now I know that you have no idea what you are talking about - OR (which would be more troubling), you are working from some kind of revisionist history.

If you are saying that whites did not have the power to change things for the better, then there is nothing that I can say to you. You don't even know where to start. Or, that blacks could have changed things in any other way. Yes, whites were dominant and blacks were without power. That is basic.

Were there other factors at work? Of course. There always are. But to ignore the major issue to focus on minors is to completely miss the point. It is like saying that the Civil War was about State's Rights and not about slavery - partial truth that does more to reveal one's bias than it does to accurately portray what happened.

I am not going to get into a pissing match with you regarding credentials on Southern history in regard to race relations. I'm good. I do, however, like to hear how white people see their history on this issue. Always stuff to learn there.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62564 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm to
There's no pissing match or revisionism. You have made a few more oversimplified statements that I won't open a can of worms on. I've answered your question. If you truly want to know "why did white people act that way" then read up on it. That's really it. That's it. Have a good day.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:05 pm
Posted by 14caratgoldjones
Uniontown, Al
Member since Aug 2009
1615 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:10 pm to
I was born and raised in Selma and live here to this day. My family has been here for 100 years and my wife's family has been here before Selma was even founded. We call those people river diggers. I will try to answer the OP's question as honestly as I can. If anyone does any research of Selma past after the Civil War on throught the 1960's, Selma was WAYY ahead of its time trying to help educated the black population. There were at least 3 HBC here and two still exist. This is in a town of less than 20,000, you don't find that in city's of 100k +. People think blacks before 1960 were just beaten and lynched for looking at white folks the wrong way. That's not even close to correct. They had their side of town and we had our side of town. That's the way BOTH sides wanted it at that time. Relations in Selma were much better than the avg southern town until the 1960's. Then one day they decided to meet here and have a march for right to vote. Every old man that was around my grandparents age basically told the blacks who worked for them to go march but when all the media and freedom fighters return home, you still have to live here. It became the Ferguson of that time. Outside agitators CAME to this town, were not born here. That alone gave the local residents and Selma itself huge black eye. They came from the hills of north Alabama, TN, and Georgia, Ky, mostly places were you don't come into contact with blacks but for some reason have a hatred for something you nothing about. White folks in Selma have been a minority for over 160 years. We know how to get along with the blacks and they know how to get along with us.
As far as how I feel about what white people did in the past it's pretty simple. You have a huge population of uneducated people that want the right to vote. Can't read to write and all of the sudden you can have a huge impact on law and govt even though you cant read or understand how it even works. Please watch the silent movie Birth of a Nation to better understand what happens when you instantly thrust unqualified people into positions of power and authority. It's like allowing millions of illegals in the US to instantly become US citizens. It can break you financially as a nation, state, city, town whatever. That was the main reason most whites didn't want them to have that power without knowing what to do with it. Give a child a handgun in a small room and see how quickly everyone else that's in that room begins to sweat and panic. Now, should they have been more proactive after the civil war to help educate the newly freed population. ABSOFREAKINLUTELY. Remember we are just coming off a war were many young southern men died fighting to protect the confederacy, the south was reeling all because an outside influence that just whipped our arse is now further opening the wound and telling us how we needed to reconstruct and run our lives. I'm sure most white blamed it on the blacks for being a main cause for all of this death and destruction and times for the blacks were actually worse right after the War than before. This mistrust and hatred continued till the World Wars. As a stated above Selma was a community that was WAAY ahead of the game in assisting blacks with a proper education during this time. We also understood it would take 50 plus years to educate a generation, get that generation to influence the next generation to see the value in an education and finally have enough educated generations that you begin to educate yourselves without the assistance of white people. This takes TIME. When we finally reach the threshold were we are all educated equally, have the same goals for our families and finances, we can all strive together to better our surroundings and evolve together as a whole.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:14 pm
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21638 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:13 pm to
Yeah, I'm done talking with you too. Tired of the arrogance.

I've read up on it. I'm confident in what I know. My point was to ask what people thought first hand in light of the movie. I thought I'd get some honest responses on an anonymous message board. It was a question of interest to me at the time. The stuff you put forward in this thread is pretty ignorant, though. Thanks for not trying to teach me anything else. I'll stick with not being further enlightened by you.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62564 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:19 pm to
Our state run education is very crafty. You give a few facts and leave a lot of things out to give the wrong impression. All you do is mention lynchings and Emmit Till. Ignore that 90+% of lynchings were in direct response to a murder or rape that the occupying Reconstruction army (hellbent on destroying all infrastructure and social order) was refusing to prosecute. Mention slavery but ignore that less than 5% of whites owned slaves and were dirt poor themselves, Natives owned slaves, and blacks owned slaves. Ignore that the slave trade was run entirely by Jews based in London and New York. You don't have to come out and say white Southerners were evil racists, just give a few bare facts out of context and voila.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21638 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:24 pm to
I appreciate you taking the time to share your perspective. It is enlightening. Thank you. Sincerely.

quote:

Selma was a city WAAY ahead of the game in assisting blacks with a proper education during this time.


Yet, 100 years after emancipation they still were not qualified to vote? Or, were too stupid? Then, how good was that education?

quote:

We also understood it would take 50 plus years to educate a generation, get that generation to influence the next generation to see the value in an education and finally have enough educated generations that you begin to educate yourselves without the assistance of white people. This takes TIME. When we finally reach the threshold were we are all educated equally, have the same goals for our families and finances, we can all strive together to better our surroundings and evolve together as a whole.


So, they could not be guaranteed to vote the way that the white citizenry would want them too? Is that what you mean? The thing about democracy or a democratice republic, it that you might not always get your way. You can't stack the deck to only have your values affirmed and call it a free country.

quote:

Please watch the silent movie Birth of a Nation...


Oh. Now I get it.

Thanks for the comment, 14caratgoldjones.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:26 pm
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62564 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Yet, 100 years after emancipation they still were not qualified to vote?
Alabama and other Southern states had black Senators within a few years of emancipation
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:29 pm
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

90+% of lynchings were in direct response to a murder or rape


Doesn't excuse it in the least.

quote:

Mention slavery but ignore that less than 5% of whites owned slaves and were dirt poor themselves


Even poor white people typically had a higher station in life than a black person.

quote:

blacks owned slaves


Extremely uncommon.

quote:

You don't have to come out and say white Southerners were evil racists, just give a few bare facts out of context and voila.


I don't think all white southerners were evil racists, but they damn sure weren't saints.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21638 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

How Do White People From Alabama Feel About "Selma" Here?
Our state run education is very crafty. You give a few facts and leave a lot of things out to give the wrong impression. All you do is mention lynchings and Emmit Till. Ignore that 90+% of lynchings were in direct response to a murder or rape that the occupying Reconstruction army (hellbent on destroying all infrastructure and social order) was refusing to prosecute. Mention slavery but ignore that less than 5% of whites owned slaves and were dirt poor themselves, Natives owned slaves, and blacks owned slaves. Ignore that the slave trade was run entirely by Jews based in London and New York. You don't have to come out and say white Southerners were evil racists, just give a few bare facts out of context and voila.



Yeah, I am familiar with your theories. I have read them before. Straight out of Southern Partisian, Neo-Confederate orthodoxy, and Lost Cause revisionism.

It is mostly bull crap.

The entire economy was based on the engine that slavery turned. Even those who didn't own slaves were mostly invested in the system that slavery supported. Plus, there were far more slave owners than was previously known. My ancestors were relatively poor farmers in Mississippi. Did not live in the cotton areas and didn't have a plantation. Census records show they owned 5 slaves. There was a lot of that.

The slave trade was not "run entirely by Jews based in London and New York." That is completely fault. What about the domestic slave trade that emerged after the Transatlantic trade shut down? All the fault of the Jews?

90% of all lynchings happened during Reconstruction because Federal troops didn't want to prosecute murdering and raping black men? Totally false.

Yes, blacks owned slaves. The very first slave owner in the Colonies was a black man around 1655. It didn't start because of Race. It started because of economics. But, then Race was brought in to justify the practice of race-based slavery that was needed economically.

Not one thing that you said in your paragraph was correct.



Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62564 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:37 pm to
Tbird, I'm not talking about right or wrong or who's guilty in the past.

I'm just talking about how certain institutions - the media & Hollywood, the dept of education - intentionally give an incomplete story. The result is we have a bullshite oversimplified good v. bad narrative.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62564 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:38 pm to
You didn't look anything up. Read Booker T Washington, former slave. His thoughts on lynchings and whatnot will open your eyes.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:39 pm
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21638 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

quote:
Yet, 100 years after emancipation they still were not qualified to vote?
Alabama and other Southern states had black Senators within a few years of emancipation


Because of Reconstruction and those evil Federal troops. Then, when Reconstruction ended, of course, those black senators were no more. Suddenly, black people became too stupid to vote again.

You are playing both sides.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62564 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:43 pm to
There are no sides. You want condemnation of a particular "side" and I'm telling you that's a fallacy.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:43 pm
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21638 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

genro

You didn't look anything up. Read Booker T Washington, former slave. His thoughts on lynchings and whatnot will open your eyes.




I have read Booker T. Washington. "Up From Slavery." I like him a lot and like his perspective much better than W.E.B. Dubois, if I had to choose. His call for self-sufficiency and personal responsibility is much needed today.

He and George Washington Carver did a great job at Tuskegee, too. Lots of educated black farmers.

I am not a fan of lynching black people in history, though. I really do believe in due process of law. It seems quite American. BTW's views would really have no affect on me one way or the other. I agree with the Constitution.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter