Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Astronomers find a 'solar twin’ — a star that looks almost exactly like our Sun

Posted on 11/20/18 at 5:14 pm
Posted by Trumansfangs
Town & Country
Member since Sep 2018
6892 posts
Posted on 11/20/18 at 5:14 pm


In a rare discovery, an international team of astronomers has found a star that was likely born in the same stellar nursery as our Sun. After analyzing the characteristics of thousands of stars in the Milky Way, the group is confident that they’ve not only found a solar sibling, but possibly a solar twin.

Named HD186302, the near-identical star is only the second of the Sun’s close relatives ever identified. The finding could help researchers understand the environment that the Sun and its siblings formed in, and possibly uncover habitable planets within the twin’s orbit.



Much more here....


Maybe we need a science board ?
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 11/20/18 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

HD186302 is a main sequence star, and it sits about 184 light-years from Earth. The star has roughly the same age, metallicity, chemical abundances and even ratios of carbon isotopes as the Sun. In other words, it's just about as Sun-like as you can get.


This star and HD 162826, at 110 light years away, will be excellent candidates for study with the James Webb Space Telescope. If it ever gets launched, that is. Originally scheduled to be launched in 2009, it is now supposed to go into space in 2021. We'll see.

quote:

In a follow-up campaign, the team plans to use ESO’s ESPRESSO and HARPS spectrographs to scan the star for orbiting planets. If found, astronomers could compare the planets that formed around our Sun to those that formed around one of its siblings, revealing the types of planets that our ancient star cluster might have left behind.


At least the Europeans are equipped to give us some idea of planets around the two sun like stars. It'll be interesting to know if their solar systems developed in any way similar to ours.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29139 posts
Posted on 11/20/18 at 8:51 pm to
Posted by beachreb61
Long Beach, MS
Member since Nov 2009
1715 posts
Posted on 11/20/18 at 9:59 pm to
And how much more grant money do they get to continue this study?
Posted by thatguy45
Your alter's mom's basement
Member since Sep 2017
18879 posts
Posted on 11/21/18 at 11:01 am to
The universe is a big place so it's bound to happen that there's a near identical star to ours
It is weird to know that there are habitable planets out there, and maybe even a sort of clone of Earth.
We should've already been colonizing either the moon or Mars IMO. But NASA's budget got cut and they stayed close to home
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21365 posts
Posted on 11/22/18 at 6:36 am to
Named HD186302......crap, I was gonna use that for my next child.
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25174 posts
Posted on 11/22/18 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Maybe we need a science board ?


This is the unofficial science board I would say. An official one would be fine for two days and then someone would post something about climate change and it would turn into a feces throwing contest.

This is a fascinating discovery. We know that our Sun is just right for supporting life. Is its solar twin equally capable of supporting life on one of its planets? If there is a planet in the "Goldilocks" zone (not too hot, not too cold, but just right) it likely has liquid water and if you have liquid water and a viable temperature then the basics for life are right there.
Posted by Kcprogguitar
Kansas City
Member since Oct 2014
887 posts
Posted on 11/22/18 at 4:01 pm to
The more I research this, the more I’m convinced that announcing a planet in the Goldilocks zone is just a look at me moment. So many things are necessary to support life, location is only the first one.

Just as important is a moon with enough mass to create the molten dynamo that generates the magnetosphere that protects us from the solar wind. I think we’re going to find a lot more variables that will become necessary as we learn more. Which I believe life is rarer than most of the posters here. There are what? Trillions of galaxies or is it mere billions? With billions of stars.Which means the right conditions are present maybe only a few hundred million times, which still makes it rare.

Honestly I’d be shocked if we found life elsewhere before another asteroid comes along and terminates us. You know it’s going to happen. We know it’s happened before and yet we do virtually nothing to prevent it.

It’s more important to talk about a fricking wall.
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25174 posts
Posted on 11/22/18 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

It’s more important to talk about a fricking wall.


We take refuge in the mundane and petty.

There are political issues from twenty years ago that had the nation in an uproar then that are now forgotten about. We progress, as a species, because a few people here and there do something important. Then the rest of us sort of amble along behind them.

Which is needed and necessary. It takes hundreds of thousands of folks who are just trying to do their jobs and raise their families to provide the stable environment necessary for some visionary to come along and drag us forward a little bit.

Democrat or Republican. Socialist or Capitalist. Someone has to make the sausages. People will always pay more attention to yet another picture of Miley Cyrus peeing in public then they will the latest scientific discovery. It happens. We will keep moving along, a little bit here, a little bit there.
Posted by Commander Data
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2016
7289 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 7:48 am to
Amen.
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
32927 posts
Posted on 11/23/18 at 11:34 pm to
Would take nearly 2 million years to get to
Posted by MaroonNation
StarkVegas, Mississippi, Bitch!
Member since Nov 2010
21950 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 2:49 am to
quote:

Would take nearly 2 million years to get to




Not if we perfect a fusion impulse drive. Hell you can get there in a 100 years or so now by just dumping out a nuke every 1000,000 miles or so and detonating it. After the 100th or so detonation you could be at 10% the speed of light.
Posted by Kcprogguitar
Kansas City
Member since Oct 2014
887 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 5:24 pm to
Yet to get the nukes to the ship, you have to lift them on a rocket.

There’s all sorts of problems with that.

It won’t happen in my lifetime, but we’ll know they’re serious about space exploration/colonization when they build a space needle.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:14 pm to
About one-tenth of the cash the Pentagon misplaced last week
Posted by MaroonNation
StarkVegas, Mississippi, Bitch!
Member since Nov 2010
21950 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:05 pm to
Theoretically we possess the ability to build a warp drive. The biggest stumbling block? It would take the GDP of every industrialized country on the planet to finance it. We are already capable of producing antimatter with the Hadron Supercollider. An antimatter Drive would require roughly 10 grams of antimatter to get us to Proxima Centauri in 40 years. The problem is that the supercollider is incapable of producing anywhere near that much. We need 1000’s of supercolliders. So, in essence, the entire planet would need to be in danger of eminent demise before all the countries could come together with the single focus of interplanetary travel.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter