Started By
Message

re: 9/11 Was A Conspiracy!

Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:14 am to
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36408 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:14 am to
quote:

I could honestly care less about this topic


Obviously.

quote:


But anyway, thermite, a 'bitches brew of thermite', is what caused metal to turn liquid.



Do you have any idea how much thermite it would take to cut through that much steel? There would have been literal tons of molten aluminum to be found.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120137 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:16 am to
Nanothermite.

If you haven't heard about it, it's because you're sane.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:18 am to
quote:



No it is not. Stop saying that. Where are some links of people saying they were there and saw molten steel?



Already posted in this thread.

Including a quote from a structural engineer at ground zero "the debris was red hot, molten, running".

From the National Environmental Health Association "streams of molten metal leaked from hot cores and flowed down broken walls inside the foundation hole"

I could keep going with these credible quotes from official reports. (And yes, these have been linked in this thread).

quote:


Where? There's only one vague picture of all the lava that everyone saw?




No theres not, there's actually many images, and video.
Posted by Hardy_Har
MS
Member since Nov 2012
16295 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Have you ever seen the inner workings of a building like that?


quote:

inner workings


quote:

work


My guess would be no, he has not.. Sleeping Tiger is the Pat Robertson of conspiricy theorists..
Posted by Slippery Slope
Hail Satan
Member since Nov 2010
20346 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Including a quote from a structural engineer at ground zero "the debris was red hot, molten, running".


The "Leslie Robertson" quote comes second-hand from James Williams, SEAU President, in an account of a Robertson presentation ( LINK ). We emailed Roberston to find out if it was accuate, and his brief reply arrived quickly:

quote:

I've no recollection of having made any such statements...nor was I in a position to have the required knowledge.


quote:

From the National Environmental Health Association "streams of molten metal leaked from hot cores and flowed down broken walls inside the foundation hole"


"I personally saw open fires, glowing and twisted I-beams. I was told, but do not remember by whom, that the workers were finding molten steel."

Everything seems to come second hand from that loony bin professor whose video you linked earlier.


quote:

No theres not, there's actually many images, and video.


Oh good. If you could link a couple of the numerous ones, that would be peachy.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 9:26 am
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:31 am to
quote:


Oh good. If you could link a couple of the numerous ones, that would be peachy.



Already have.

Your link doesn't work.
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:32 am to
I heard you went to a school that had engineering in its name.
Posted by Slippery Slope
Hail Satan
Member since Nov 2010
20346 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Your link doesn't work.


Well that's fricking weird because it's the supposed goddamn source of this fricking quote:

quote:

"the debris was red hot, molten, running".
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36408 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:34 am to
Doesn't change the amounts needed much. Nanoparticles just make it easier to light and the reaction a bit more controllable. Probably would have noticed an obvious glow like that of a welder if that was used.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:35 am to
quote:

I heard you went to a school that had engineering in its name.


You say this as if I used it as a way to give myself accreditation, which I didn't.

But context is rarely considered here, so not surprising.
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:36 am to
quote:

ou say this as if I used it as a way to give myself accreditation, which I didn't.




You clearly did
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Doesn't change the amounts needed much. Nanoparticles just make it easier to light and the reaction a bit more controllable. Probably would have noticed an obvious glow like that of a welder if that was used.



And there was.
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:37 am to
quote:

What did I say that has anything to do with civil engineering?

Firefighters on the scene reported molten lava. What does sharing that have to do with being any kind of mastermind?

By the way, 'engineering' is in the name of the university I went to.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:40 am to
Um, yeah, exactly.

Nothing I said had anything to do with being an engineering mastermind, so knowing or not knowing anything about engineering was irrelevant in that case.

I personally saw a bit of irony and found it funny that I was being called uneducated in general and lacking in engineering knowledge when my universities name has engineering in it.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134050 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:42 am to
Wow.
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:43 am to
You tried to pass your opinion off as more viable becuase you went to a school that has engineering in the title. Dont try and back away from that now. That would be cowardly.
Posted by RedPants
GA
Member since Jan 2013
5785 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

my universities name has engineering in it.


DeVry?
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36408 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:45 am to
I don't think you understand the scope of the glow I'm talking about with that much nanothermite. It would have everyone would have noticed and talked about from The start of the strangeness.

Doesn't change the problem of the amount of Al snag that would have been found along with significant amounts of iron slag. Not some, shittons. The problems with directing a reaction that combusts and supplies it's own oxygen. Or the fact any static discharge could have set the whole thing off before the planes hit. Or the fact it took so long to ignite after being exposed to the heat of a burning building.

Also, the planes were enough to bring down the towers. So why go through the trouble of putting in tons of thermite to cut the beams?
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39545 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:47 am to
Have we found the volcano yet?
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:47 am to
quote:

ou tried to pass your opinion off as more viable becuase you went to a school that has engineering in the title. Dont try and back away from that now


No I didn't, not in any way, because what was said had nothing at all to do with engineering, making his statement about my lack of engineering knowledge non sensical.

How could I make an opinion that has nothing to do with engineering more viable by saying I went to an engineering school?
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 48
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 48Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter