Started By
Message

OC Speculations....
Posted on 12/12/12 at 8:13 am
Posted on 12/12/12 at 8:13 am
Who gives a shite....????
This post was edited on 12/12/12 at 9:14 am
Posted on 12/12/12 at 8:29 am to notsince98
quote:
tl,dr, fail....?
Care to explain?
Posted on 12/12/12 at 8:30 am to jafo
I'd like to speculate that the speculation on the OC position is notihing but pure speculation at this point. Any rumors are purely speculative, and its been speculated that they will remain that way until a formal announcement is made. Thus ending any speculation that was speculated.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:10 am to SoCalMIZ
quote:
I'd like to speculate that the speculation on the OC position is notihing but pure speculation at this point. Any rumors are purely speculative, and its been speculated that they will remain that way until a formal announcement is made. Thus ending any speculation that was speculated.
There ya go SoCal. Edited for ya. Better?
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:14 am to jafo
This thread is now meaningful.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:16 am to jafo
I actually agreed with your initial speculation. However, its like covert operations when trying to figure out whats going on in como. All the pieces sure seem to fit though.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:20 am to notsince98
quote:
This thread is now meaningful
I'm glad you could comprehend the edit I made. I was worried it would still be too repetitious and complicated.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:40 am to SoCalMIZ
quote:
I actually agreed with your initial speculation. However, its like covert operations when trying to figure out whats going on in como. All the pieces sure seem to fit though.
Dude, I was attempting to tie in a couple threads in one place to talk about the OC job. That and to reaffirm that it is all speculation at this point. Not everyone understands this. The next OC could be anyone at this point.
But things have come to light that add up.
But no, I have to disagree that you agreed with my original post. There was nothing in your response that told me you agreed with the original thread. Just sarcasm. Much like 98 responded. So obviously the thread sucked. I don't know why, as I have yet to get anyone to explain why it sucked, one only gets sarcasm.
But there it is. No biggy. I fixed it, not worth talking about now. This thread is dead.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:45 am to jafo
Your post didn't suck, and I wasn't being sarcastic about your post. My post was a statement on the state of "information" regarding the OC job. As in, no one really has any information. It's all 100% speculation.
Sorry you took it so personal.
Take the stick out of your arse.
Sorry you took it so personal.
Take the stick out of your arse.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 12:10 pm to SoCalMIZ
I got no idea if your post was good or not. It was just too long for me to read. This OC search is boring no matter what thread it is. GP isn't going to save his job with this hire so it doesn't matter.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 2:58 pm to notsince98
quote:
I got no idea if your post was good or not. It was just too long for me to read. This OC search is boring no matter what thread it is. GP isn't going to save his job with this hire so it doesn't matter.
Then why post if you didn't want to read it? There is too much whirling around to try and sum it up in two sentences.
If it's too much to read, move along and don't post?
Posted on 12/12/12 at 3:08 pm to SoCalMIZ
quote:
Your post didn't suck, and I wasn't being sarcastic about your post. My post was a statement on the state of "information" regarding the OC job. As in, no one really has any information. It's all 100% speculation. Sorry you took it so personal. Take the stick out of your arse.
Hey, sorry I got a Giant Redwood up my arse, but the first post lodged it in there pretty tight. Then I got your first post and said screw it. The giant tree in my arse may have clouded my vision and thought process. Maybe it was the repetitive usage of "specualtion" that turn the tree in my arse.
Sorry man. Know any good tree trimmers?
Posted on 12/12/12 at 3:26 pm to jafo
Lol. Nope. You'll have to perform a self-extraction.
Btw, I'm typing this after a pupil dilation so if it makes no sense sorry ahead of time. Seriously can't see shite.
Btw, I'm typing this after a pupil dilation so if it makes no sense sorry ahead of time. Seriously can't see shite.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 3:35 pm to SoCalMIZ
quote:
Lol. Nope. You'll have to perform a self-extraction.
Well thats gonna leave a mark or two then.
This post was edited on 12/12/12 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 12/12/12 at 3:58 pm to jafo
quote:
If it's too much to read, move along and don't post?
Because this board is slow and your thread needed some traffic.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 6:02 pm to notsince98
quote:
Because this board is slow and your thread needed some traffic.
Ouch.....very nice.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 6:03 pm to SoCalMIZ
quote:
I'm typing this after a pupil dilation so if it makes no sense sorry ahead of time. Seriously can't see shite.
I can see properly now. Nary a typo in that post.
That's what makes me so Jumbo.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 7:09 pm to SoCalMIZ
You must do a different pupil dilation then I used to cause I wouldn't be able to post shite right now....I'd still be dilating my eyes....
The good ole days.. 
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:06 pm to jafo
I'm speculating that it's not gonna be Chaney.
Back to top
2






