Started By
Message
most shocking and depressing(?) Brady cook stat tweet
Posted on 9/14/23 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 9/14/23 at 2:42 pm
LINK
Of the 36 QBs with at least 100 pass attempts for Mizzou since 1960, Brady Cook ranks:
2nd in completion %
9th in yards per attempt
4th in adjusted yards per attempt
2nd in passer rating,
1st in TD/INT
1st in INT%
6th in yards per rush
amount of Short passes inflate some of these stats
Of the 36 QBs with at least 100 pass attempts for Mizzou since 1960, Brady Cook ranks:
2nd in completion %
9th in yards per attempt
4th in adjusted yards per attempt
2nd in passer rating,
1st in TD/INT
1st in INT%
6th in yards per rush
amount of Short passes inflate some of these stats
This post was edited on 9/14/23 at 2:49 pm
4
Posted on 9/14/23 at 6:01 pm to mizslu314
I saw that tweet.
Cook is also not in the top 10 SEC QBs through 2 games in yards per game passing. So, he throws very little, and they don't go far.
Cook is also not in the top 10 SEC QBs through 2 games in yards per game passing. So, he throws very little, and they don't go far.
Posted on 9/14/23 at 6:24 pm to mizslu314
Trent Dilfer has more SB rings than Marino, Tarkenton, Fouts, and Jim Kelly ...
So I guess based on that stat he was a better QB than all of them.
Solid logic in that tweet ...
So I guess based on that stat he was a better QB than all of them.
Solid logic in that tweet ...
Posted on 9/14/23 at 6:41 pm to Indignity
Is that career or this season ?
Posted on 9/14/23 at 6:41 pm to AmishSamurai
Trent >
Posted on 9/14/23 at 8:01 pm to mizslu314
Season
Posted on 9/15/23 at 4:51 am to mizslu314
I feel like those rankings are greatly inflated because he just doesn’t pass much.
I’d wager his attempts per season lag massively behind Daniel, Franklin, Gabbert, and Mauk. And I bet his effectiveness numbers lag behind Brad too.
I’d wager his attempts per season lag massively behind Daniel, Franklin, Gabbert, and Mauk. And I bet his effectiveness numbers lag behind Brad too.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 6:22 am to GalacticaCannon
Bazelak is the 9th all-time leading passer at Mizzou. He was a mediocre QB for 24 games for us. So I’m not sure all-time leading stats as a Mizzou QB means all that much (unfortunately).
Posted on 9/15/23 at 8:13 am to the808bass
Oh most definitely. We didn’t become a heralded passing attack until Pinkel got here. Then everyone who followed him suck the sails from the passing attack.
I won’t even credit BoDumb for Lock. He was a MU lock thru and thru and recruited by GP.
shite our offense has been depressing for damn near a decade.
I won’t even credit BoDumb for Lock. He was a MU lock thru and thru and recruited by GP.
shite our offense has been depressing for damn near a decade.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 2:16 pm to mizslu314
I would bet that a low bar of "playing 4 games as QB" means anything outside of top 10 would be very bad.
Cook has been insanely lucky at how many potential INTs haven't become INTs.
Passer rating must be a bad stat.
I can think of 5 QB's (covering 17 years of the last 28) lightyears better in moving the offense in the last 30 years, not including Lock.
Cook has been insanely lucky at how many potential INTs haven't become INTs.
Passer rating must be a bad stat.
I can think of 5 QB's (covering 17 years of the last 28) lightyears better in moving the offense in the last 30 years, not including Lock.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 3:41 pm to deputyfife
I think with a good offensive line there’s a world where cook is a serviceable qb on a ten win team, but he’s so risk adverse he wants to take 15 plays every drive and this o line will break down somewhere along the way. Drinks got a decision where it’s either horn and schraeder or cook and peat but you can’t be conservative at both positions IE cook and schraeder
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News