Started By
Message
Arkansas thread
Posted on 10/22/16 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 10/22/16 at 8:21 pm
There is a thread on their site asking if Odom will be available as their DC next year. They can have him only if they take the rest of the defensive staff too.
1
Posted on 10/23/16 at 3:38 am to surgicalvenom
You think that Coach Kul is laughing down there in Miami?
Posted on 10/23/16 at 11:17 am to Zou brownmajic
I think he enjoys Odom's ineptitude, but I think he feels bad for his DL kids.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 11:20 am to Zou brownmajic
His defensive front is the primary reason Miami is 13th in the ACC in rushing defense so far in conference play.. He doesn't have time to laugh as he didn't inherit a unit devoid of talent.
This post was edited on 10/23/16 at 11:21 am
Posted on 10/23/16 at 11:30 am to navynuke
Definition of irony...Kul is teaching an attacking scheme for the front 4. What scheme did Miami use the previous 3 years you ask? Read and React. A scheme 1 DL described as a "bumass" scheme.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 11:52 am to surgicalvenom
They went to a simpler scheme and still can't stop anyone. It doesn't sound like the scheme was the "bumass" constituent in the product.
I get that the current scheme isn't popular. It isn't easy to deploy. It places more responsibility on the players and it doesn't fill up a stat sheet for the defensive linemen. That doesn't mean that it won't get them to the NFL. If college stats were what personnel depts weighed most of their decisions on, the wouldn't waste money on the combine and going to pro days.
I get that the current scheme isn't popular. It isn't easy to deploy. It places more responsibility on the players and it doesn't fill up a stat sheet for the defensive linemen. That doesn't mean that it won't get them to the NFL. If college stats were what personnel depts weighed most of their decisions on, the wouldn't waste money on the combine and going to pro days.
This post was edited on 10/23/16 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 10/23/16 at 11:55 am to navynuke
Cant speak to that, I just enjoy the irony of Kuls path.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:01 pm to surgicalvenom
They irony that when his front is faced with a group of guys that aren't waist benders, they get throttled and run over?
Posted on 10/23/16 at 1:49 pm to navynuke
That's not accurate
They've given up the second fewest rushing TDs, they are also giving up 3.42 yards per carry (8th in their league, not 13th)
They also, unsurprisingly, lead the ACC in TFL and 5th in sacks (3 behind 1st)
They are 4th in their league in defensive YPP
Do I need to contrast that with our stats?
The style of play works. It's not inferior. It worked here and it's working there.
I have no idea why Odom would dislike Kul. He should be thanking him profusely, because had he been allowed to install this "bumass" scheme last year there is zero chance he's now the head coach.
They've given up the second fewest rushing TDs, they are also giving up 3.42 yards per carry (8th in their league, not 13th)
They also, unsurprisingly, lead the ACC in TFL and 5th in sacks (3 behind 1st)
They are 4th in their league in defensive YPP
Do I need to contrast that with our stats?
The style of play works. It's not inferior. It worked here and it's working there.
I have no idea why Odom would dislike Kul. He should be thanking him profusely, because had he been allowed to install this "bumass" scheme last year there is zero chance he's now the head coach.
This post was edited on 10/23/16 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 10/23/16 at 2:03 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
That's not accurate
They've given up the second fewest rushing TDs, they are also giving up 3.42 yards per carry (8th in their league, not 13th)
ACC Conference Play Rushing Defense
Posted on 10/23/16 at 2:05 pm to navynuke
You didn't say conference play until you edited your original post.
No matter though, they are still better than 13 in YPC and what I said still stands.
No matter though, they are still better than 13 in YPC and what I said still stands.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 2:10 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
You didn't say conference play until you edited your original post.
You mean when I edited it at 11:21 PM, almost 3 hours before you made your post?
Nice try to cover your lack of comprehension.
This post was edited on 10/23/16 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 10/23/16 at 2:12 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
No matter though, they are still better than 13 in YPC and what I said still stands.
Yeah, they are tied for 11th.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 2:24 pm to navynuke
Yes, along with the other things I mentioned. Of course, you want to cherry pick to try and prove whatever point you are making.
Facts are, they've been pretty good on defense. Just like we were before we went away from what we do. Now we are arse.
Spin it however you like.
Facts are, they've been pretty good on defense. Just like we were before we went away from what we do. Now we are arse.
Spin it however you like.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 2:33 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Facts are, they've been pretty good on defense
Miami is 11th in total defense during conference play and they are 1-4 in ACC play.
ACC YDS per game Conference play
Spin that.
*Edit* This Miami team is composed of 5 classes and the lowest rated class was the 2015 class ranked 26th with 7 4* rated players.
This post was edited on 10/23/16 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 10/23/16 at 2:56 pm to navynuke
No need to spin anything. Yards per game is a shitty stat.
YPP is a much better indicator of how good a defense is. They are 4th in the ACC.
YPP is a much better indicator of how good a defense is. They are 4th in the ACC.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 3:08 pm to JesusQuintana
5.54 yds per play is what you are hanging your hat on?
OK.
OK.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 3:11 pm to navynuke
OMG you two, you both win. Miami sucks, we suck, fans suck, recruiting sucks, BO sucks, Cross sucks, the rant sucks, game over.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 3:16 pm to surgicalvenom
You forgot Kimbo.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 5:57 pm to navynuke
quote:
5.54 yds per play is what you are hanging your hat on?
Yes
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News