Started By
Message
3
Posted on 6/25/13 at 4:57 pm to TrueSon2014
Dominique Booth says Mizzou is back in the picture
Posted on 6/25/13 at 4:58 pm to TrueSon2014
On Fraizer... I have a feeling those numbers are either outdated or he doesn't really have an offer.
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:00 pm to reedus23
I could be thinking of the wrong school, but I thought they might have had a decent girls basketball program.
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:01 pm to reedus23
quote:
Heard of it but never even knew they had a football team.
According to his twitter, they were undefeated last season - he posted a pic of their record. It looks like a school focused on getting kids either into college or a technical school. It's not a district, you have to apply to go there, apparently. Their valedictorian from 2013 is going to Princeton on a full ride, per their website.
This post was edited on 6/25/13 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:01 pm to TrueSon2014
quote:
5.0 40?.... Where is he from?
St. Louis
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:03 pm to semotruman
quote:
According to his twitter, they were undefeated last season - he posted a pic of their record. It looks like a school focused on getting kids either into college or a technical school. It's not a district, you have to apply to go there, apparently.
That's kind of what I was thinking. I couldn't think of the right term for that type of high school, but I almost thought of it as a technical type school.
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:04 pm to URHatinIt
quote:
Dominique Booth says Mizzou is back in the picture
Now that is beautiful news. Just wait until after week 5 then make your decision. If we're 5-0 I like our chances a ton more.
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:05 pm to URHatinIt
Could be both. There is next to no information on his school, much less him. Matter said he confirmed it with Frazier but who knows.
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:08 pm to reedus23
It looks like a school that doesn't put a big focus on athletics. Huh. Well, I'm sure we'll learn more, one way or the other. 
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:09 pm to reedus23
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:11 pm to semotruman
quote:
It looks like a school that doesn't put a big focus on athletics. Huh. Well, I'm sure we'll learn more, one way or the other.
That's exactly what I pictured. With the public schools going under in the City, I thought it was started to give some of the inner city kids a chance at an education and a future. Don't think it's that old of a school, but could be wrong. Wish the kid luck regardless.
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:12 pm to reedus23
quote:
LINK
They played class 4 in Missouri
Huh. Who knew?
And that's a great goal in the city. From the SLPS website, it looks like a concept school that focuses on getting kids educated and on a career path - not sports. Maybe we got lucky?
This post was edited on 6/25/13 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:20 pm to reedus23
I remember MCA coming down to SWMO 8-9 yrs ago and got destroyed by Cassville.
This post was edited on 6/25/13 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:25 pm to URHatinIt
quote:
I remember MCA coming down to SWMO 8-9 yrs ago and got destroyed by Cassville.
Might have been their first graduating class. Found a link that says it was founded in 2000.
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:31 pm to reedus23
I complained about the Hudson commitment, but I do actually like those type of guys. Athletic, new to a position, seems like he's got a lot of room to grow. And plus it's a FLA pick-up.
But I can't hold back on this slow midget of a WR we just got.. why, why is all I want to know. No one else is interested in him, why let him take up a scholarship at this point. Dumpster Dive should be hash tagged after all Mizzou commitments.
But I can't hold back on this slow midget of a WR we just got.. why, why is all I want to know. No one else is interested in him, why let him take up a scholarship at this point. Dumpster Dive should be hash tagged after all Mizzou commitments.
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:33 pm to mograyback
quote:
But I can't hold back on this slow midget of a WR we just got.. why, why is all I want to know. No one else is interested in him, why let him take up a scholarship at this point. Dumpster Dive should be hash tagged after all Mizzou commitments.
Mogray, you just made me spit soda all over the computer. I'm not going to argue the point no more though.
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:37 pm to mograyback
quote:
No one else is interested in him, why let him take up a scholarship at this point.
While the other parts of the post cracked me up, I do think this is a legitimate point. It doesn't mean the kids aren't players. Very well could be diamond in the roughs. But if there are no other offers on the table, wouldn't it make sense to hold off until you get further down the line and see how the rest of your class is shaping up? I mean, what if we get Booth, Lee, Harrison and another 1 or 2 WR's. Would we really take that many WR's in this class?
Posted on 6/25/13 at 5:42 pm to Mizzou23
quote:
Per Terez Paylor Zach Hudson has committed to Mizzou. Current no star.
Don't piss on a OT outta Fla... A lot of very good OL kids have come outta Fla & Ga. as 2*-3*'s. Kid has good size & a frame to add weight to.
Basically the difference between a 4*-5* OL down here is he's grown up early & will be a starter as a Fr-RsF vs a guy who might need a year in the program to develop...
FWIW... UGA took an OL last week(Jake Edwards)with NO FBS offers... check out this stellar offer list...
Just saying OL is a crap shoot & trust your evaluators if you can...
Page 41 of 146
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News