Started By
Message
re: A point about Mullen
Posted on 11/1/13 at 9:25 am to Cdawg
Posted on 11/1/13 at 9:25 am to Cdawg
quote:
you mean as opposed to who won one at UF as an OC.
Don't even try to tell me these are half the same thing. Spurriers teams were arguably more dominant than Urbans, and had a lot less foundation. Furthermore, a lot of people don't remember that while Mullen was running the offense Charlie Strong was also running the defense. Not to mention Mullen wasn't in charge of recruiting, no one's getting him the type of players he had there. Even if Mullen isn't the best of recruiters as head coach he should be making sure someone else is taking care of it, akin to what Brewster did last year.
quote:
Chris Jones? Are you saying this b/c of CJ? South Carolina has twice the population as MS. State will never be able to get all 12 dandy dozen as ole miss will not either. ole miss was able to land out of state recruits and props to them.
Chris Jones really isn't a standard we can hold ourselves too, he was a kid we picked up early that exploded as the season went on that we nearly lost in the end. I'm not asking that we consistently land the dandy dozen, but we should be fighting for the top recruits every year. Since Mullen has got here, not including 2009, we've missed guys like Shon Coleman, Channing Ward, CJ Johnson, Brassel, Moncrief, Sanders, Connor, Liggins, Alford, Kailo, Rod Taylor, CJ Hampton, etc. I'm not asking that we land all of those kids, but we should have been a lot closer to landing a bunch of them. Ward lives what, 30 minutes away from Starkville? Liggins and Alford fit the offense we run when we had no depth at QB? Not to mention we were basically the only school offering to play Liggins at QB and had a great baseball team to offer to Alford. Kailo we all know about, Connor we got in late but had a family member on staff, Rod Taylor was highly ranked guy in a position of need that could've come in and started right off the bat considering we're losing two of our two deep at guard next year. CJ Hampton is cousins with last year's starting quarterback and in an area that's traditionally an MSU lean and in a position we can offer immediate playing time. With the exception of those kids who committed to us then flipped I had never felt like we were in the game to get any of those kids.
I mean, I guess I am neglecting to mention kids like Nick James, Kaleb Eulls, Quay Evans, PJ Jones, Michael Carr, Shumpert etc, but those cases IMO are less frequent and littered with wasted potential(Which while isn't a recruiting problem per se, is still on the fault of our staff). For all the talk our staff gets about developing players I don't see how many of our player have lived up to their potential.
quote:
Wilson and Smith and earlier Torbush were all forced out for the most part, everyone else was replaced only because they voluntarily left.
Smith left on his own terms, and all we did to Wilson was demote him from DC. If he would have stayed at MSU as a D-Line coach we would have kept him, but he came here to be a coordinator and would have rather made a lateral coaching move to a better coaching job.
Posted on 11/1/13 at 10:12 am to LBC
quote:
Don't even try to tell me these are half the same thing.
I'm not telling you that but was pointing out the fact you were downplaying dan's attributes in your post and not Spurrier's. And you pointed out Hud's wins with disclaimers and not the wins that all seem to point to against teams with losing records. That's all.
This post was edited on 11/1/13 at 11:49 am
Posted on 11/1/13 at 10:15 am to Diamondawg
quote:
I wouldn't give a dime toward a buyout and I would not be hypocritical in demanding something that I didn't have enough desire to see it happen as to donate toward it.
*High Five*
Posted on 11/1/13 at 11:10 am to Diamondawg
quote:
But, the ones I know don't talk about stuff like this
Here is the message the way that I got it at breakfast.
I would never, never, never say anything bad about the university or anyone that works at the university. You just don't do that. If something does need to be said, I will talk directly to whomever. If I have an issue with Mullen, I am not telling you because you aren't Dan or Scott. The one thing that I will share with you is that all of us have a great relationship with the university and everyone that works there.
Posted on 11/1/13 at 11:22 am to Allyn McKeen
quote:Bingo. Not saying there aren't any "chest thumpers" out there that like to wear their money on their shoulders and act like they have more say than they really do, but I would say most of the money folks are like the one with whom you had breakfast.
I would never, never, never say anything bad about the university or anyone that works at the university. You just don't do that. If something does need to be said, I will talk directly to whomever. If I have an issue with Mullen, I am not telling you because you aren't Dan or Scott. The one thing that I will share with you is that all of us have a great relationship with the university and everyone that works there.
Posted on 11/1/13 at 12:24 pm to Allyn McKeen
So, you don't think the CB's discuss matters behind closed doors and otherwise coordinate with each other? They just discuss all this stuff one-on-one with the university -- instead of handling all major issues as a group, thus vastly increasing their power and requiring them to coordinate in advance?
No offense -- the response you got might as well have been to an interview instead of a discussion among friends/peers.
The Cigar Boys discuss this stuff. Rest assured. And word from those discussions filter to the next level of boosters, who are often business associates and friends of the top level and considered "insiders" among the group and in the email chain. I'm telling you what's being relayed to me from the 2nd level. From a guy that disagrees with it, fwiw...
No offense -- the response you got might as well have been to an interview instead of a discussion among friends/peers.
The Cigar Boys discuss this stuff. Rest assured. And word from those discussions filter to the next level of boosters, who are often business associates and friends of the top level and considered "insiders" among the group and in the email chain. I'm telling you what's being relayed to me from the 2nd level. From a guy that disagrees with it, fwiw...
This post was edited on 11/1/13 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 11/1/13 at 1:04 pm to engie
Things I've always wondered since I first saw the term Cigar Boys back on Gene's Page around 1998.
How many Cigar Boys are there? When did they get this nickname? What's their favorite cigar?
How many Cigar Boys are there? When did they get this nickname? What's their favorite cigar?
Posted on 11/1/13 at 1:07 pm to engie
I want to be a one of them Real Boys. A cigar boy. Like Riff Raff.
Posted on 11/1/13 at 1:33 pm to TaxmanMSU
quote:All you have to do is log into your Dog Tag account and plug in a number to calculate how to get into the top 100 or so. It's just money.
I want to be a one of them Real Boys. A cigar boy. Like Riff Raff.
ETA: I just did it. If I gave them a $100,000 check, I would rank 116 out of 9,583
This post was edited on 11/1/13 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 11/1/13 at 2:08 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
I would rank 116 out of 9,583
Virginia Slim level
Posted on 11/1/13 at 2:19 pm to Diamondawg
I need to donate enough to kick in Stricklin's door and slap him. Top 50 for that?
Posted on 11/1/13 at 3:38 pm to Cdawg
quote:
hings I've always wondered since I first saw the term Cigar Boys back on Gene's Page around 1998.
How many Cigar Boys are there? When did they get this nickname? What's their favorite cigar?
Great questions.
Look at these two boards -- that basically run our university on one board and athletics dept on the other one -- and the names you recognize generally = Cigar Boy.
I consider the decision-makers to be a group of 7-10, sometimes up to 15 when there's disagreement...
Bulldog Club Board
MSU Foundation Board
This post was edited on 11/1/13 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 11/1/13 at 3:55 pm to engie
that post was partly in jest but thanks.
Posted on 11/1/13 at 4:19 pm to engie
I'll just post this and move along. You are welcome to believe any Black Ops bullshite you want to, but you are doing a disservice to people that do a world of good for our university for both athletics and academics.
There is a clear understanding among the members that no donor can tell the President, Athletic Director, or any Coach how to do their job. Violators are not welcome.
There is a clear understanding among the members that no donor can tell the President, Athletic Director, or any Coach how to do their job. Violators are not welcome.
Posted on 11/1/13 at 4:25 pm to Allyn McKeen
quote:
You are welcome to believe any Black Ops bullshite you want to, but you are doing a disservice to people that do a world of good for our university for both athletics and academics.
quote:
There is a clear understanding among the members that no donor can tell the President, Athletic Director, or any Coach how to do their job. Violators are not welcome.
So what you're saying is that you don't think big time boosters have anything to do with the decisions that are made in the athletic department?
Posted on 11/1/13 at 4:33 pm to LBC
quote:
Smith left on his own terms, and all we did to Wilson was demote him from DC. If he would have stayed at MSU as a D-Line coach we would have kept him, but he came here to be a coordinator and would have rather made a lateral coaching move to a better coaching job.
You can't do any more to get rid of a guy than what we did to Wilson. Smith was also advised to look around. No we didn't fire them because that's not the way its done. I can't remember the last time we actually let an assistant go when they had no other job to go to, usually they are just made aware its time to find another job.
This post was edited on 11/1/13 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 11/1/13 at 4:51 pm to Allyn McKeen
quote:
I'll just post this and move along. You are welcome to believe any Black Ops bullshite you want to, but you are doing a disservice to people that do a world of good for our university for both athletics and academics.
How is voicing their opinions a disservice to anyone? I'm not outing them as individuals. I'm giving their general consensus.
quote:
There is a clear understanding among the members that no donor can tell the President, Athletic Director, or any Coach how to do their job. Violators are not welcome.
Where did I accuse them of "telling anyone how to do their jobs?"
So, ultimately, our money people -- who I just showed on boards that have oversight over all university personnel -- have no say in what happens? LOL
Feel free to issue me another "bullshite" press release though...
This post was edited on 11/1/13 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 11/1/13 at 7:48 pm to engie
quote:The people I know or know of on those lists own something. That's the common denominator among them. So, if you young folks want to influence things; own something.
Bulldog Club Board
MSU Foundation Board
Popular
Back to top

2





