Started By
Message
re: Ban Latarian
Posted on 3/2/14 at 5:22 pm to TTsTowel
Posted on 3/2/14 at 5:22 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
As far as I see it, beaver posted flame threads but the admins saw no reason to delete them. On the other hand, Latarian is bumping multiple threads, which is against the rules.
Beaver does nothing but troll and needs his arse banned.
2
Posted on 3/2/14 at 5:54 pm to piggilicious
Ban, no
Needs attention, yes
Needs attention, yes
Posted on 3/2/14 at 6:09 pm to piggilicious
You're not much better in your posting
Posted on 3/2/14 at 6:14 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Find me some threads I've started trolling and count the number of comments I've made calling Gus a piece of shite, trash, douche etc and get back with me.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 6:14 pm to tduecen
quote:
How is that word any different than saying a poster is a fricking idiot, retard, dumbass, etc? It isn't so I don't see how that could be ban able while those are not.
quote:
count: Derogatory term for a woman. Considered by many to be the most offensive word in the English language. ?Urban Dictionary: count - ?Twat - ?Snatch
Yes, yes, it is.
And considering the fact you've been here 100 years, I'm sure you know that. I've been here a bit over one year & have seen a few bannings simply for calling another poster that term, unprovoked. Considering your vast knowledge, I'm pretty positive you know that's not a widely acceptable word, here or anywhere else, which is why arguing about it is ignorant.
Btw, just curious, would you treat/discipline one of your elementary school students who called another "stupid" the same as one who called another a "c*** "?
Posted on 3/2/14 at 6:16 pm to Arkla Missy
Consider no one here is an elementary school student it is irrelevant and I've seen count used a lot on the OT in reference to other posters including females.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 6:20 pm to tduecen
quote:
Consider no one here is an elementary school student ...
That's debatable.
quote:
I've seen count used a lot on the OT in reference to other posters including females.
Then it wasn't RA'd.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 6:25 pm to Arkla Missy
quote:
That's debatable
Seems to be a large number on here that are at least mentally in elementary school if not physically.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 6:37 pm to Litigator
Without a doubt.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 6:59 pm to piggilicious
So trolling is just about bad names? Interesting
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:02 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
No it also involves starting pure trolling threads.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:15 pm to Arkla Missy
quote:ehhh
Yes, yes, it is.
And considering the fact you've been here 100 years, I'm sure you know that. I've been here a bit over one year & have seen a few bannings simply for calling another poster that term, unprovoked. Considering your vast knowledge, I'm pretty positive you know that's not a widely acceptable word, here or anywhere else, which is why arguing about it is ignorant
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:22 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
Seems to be a large number on here that are at least mentally in elementary school if not physically.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:24 pm to Arkla Missy
What? I'm not saying its not offensive. I'm saying that: A) compared to what is allowed on this place, the word count should not be bannable and B) I can't remember seeing someone being banned for saying the word and I've been around for a while
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:28 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
As far as I see it, beaver posted flame threads but the admins saw no reason to delete them. On the other hand, Latarian is bumping multiple threads, which is against the rules.
I think you're definitely missing the point of what Lat did today.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:32 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
What? I'm not saying its not offensive. I'm saying that: A) compared to what is allowed on this place, the word count should not be bannable.
It is.
quote:
B) I can't remember seeing someone being banned for saying the word and I've been around for a while
There have been bannings for calling someone that name.
Sorry, don't know what to tell you.
Eta - in reference to your "what?" My first reply was toward your third response of "ehhhhh." Just to be clear.
This post was edited on 3/2/14 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:33 pm to Arkla Missy
quote:then it is probably because something else the poster did along with it. Cause I've seen is used regularly without bannings
There have been bannings for calling someone that name.
Sorry, don't know what to tell you.
quote:is it though? Like I said, I've seen it used regularly without banning
It is.
This post was edited on 3/2/14 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:38 pm to WestCoastAg
And if it is bannable, then that's stupid considering people can call a&m posters faggies, nazis, or members of the Hitler youth corps without being banned
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:42 pm to WestCoastAg
Obviously, it depends on whether or not an admin sees it which of course depends on if the post is RA'd.
You certainly don't have to take my word for it. I suppose you can call anyone whatever you want if it's that important to you.
You certainly don't have to take my word for it. I suppose you can call anyone whatever you want if it's that important to you.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 7:44 pm to Arkla Missy
I don't call people count here. This has nothing to do with me wanting to use the word and everything to do with me not seeing people who use it getting banned often
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News