Started By
Message

re: Texas game...

Posted on 10/4/25 at 6:53 pm to
Posted by Ramblin American
In the middle of the Carolinas
Member since Jun 2025
173 posts
Posted on 10/4/25 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Crazy Napier giving TX all that extra time at the end.
He's not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Posted by Lizardgrad89
Member since Jul 2025
27 posts
Posted on 10/4/25 at 8:43 pm to
He has a real knack for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Fortunately the defense had other ideas.
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
20815 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 4:47 am to
Why cant every offensive drive be like the first?

Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
20815 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 4:59 am to
quote:

Crazy Napier giving TX all that extra time at the end.

10 seconds when the clock stopped anyway and you lose your OT for a play.. or take the TO and keep your OL in the game when you know Texas is gonna bring pressure on 3rd down.


Had he let it run off and the backup allows a sack or misses a crucial block youd all be bitching

Its a damned if you do damned if you dont scenario
Still fire Billy, but theres reason for that call that i cant really argue
This post was edited on 10/5/25 at 5:00 am
Posted by Gator5220
Member since Aug 2010
4723 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 7:36 am to
It was a running clock, not a stopped clock plus a 10 sec runoff.
What's the rule on taking the runoff, let the clock run then calling a TO with one second on the play clock so you can reinsert the OT player?
Posted by TDFreak
Coast to Coast - L.A. to Chicago
Member since Dec 2009
8857 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 7:42 am to
Correct.

After the runoff, the clock would not restart until the snap.
Posted by Gator5220
Member since Aug 2010
4723 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 7:49 am to
If it's a running clock (which iirc it was), there would be a 10 sec runoff. The clock starts when the ref signals ready for play, not the snap, which means the clock continues to run.

Seems to me time is the biggest priority not the OT that had to leave for a snap. Texas should have had at most 30 seconds left when they got the ball. They were gifted an extra 3-4 plays because of clock management.



Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
20815 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 7:55 am to
quote:

It was a running clock,

Im pretty sure the Clock stopped when the helmet came off, it has to so the refs can inform the player to get off the field and rotate with the backup for one play.

Well, here we go.
Helmet Comes Off—?Timeout

ARTICLE 9.

If a player’s helmet comes completely off through play, other than as the direct result of a foul by an opponent, the player must leave the game for the next down. The game clock will stop at the end of the down. The player may remain in the game if his team is granted a charged timeout.

When the helmet coming off is the only reason for stopping the clock, other than due to an injury to the player or his teammate (Rule 3-3-5), the following conditions apply (A.R. 3-3-9-I-III):

The play clock will be set at 25 seconds if the player is on offense and at 40 seconds if the player is on defense. With one minute or more remaining in either half, the game clock will start on the referee’s signal.

If there is less than one minute in the half the opponent has the option of a 10-second runoff, unless the helmet comes off as the direct result of a foul by the opponent.

If there is a 10-second runoff the game clock will start on the referee’s signal. If there is no 10-second runoff the game clock will start on the snap.
This post was edited on 10/5/25 at 8:01 am
Posted by TDFreak
Coast to Coast - L.A. to Chicago
Member since Dec 2009
8857 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 8:09 am to
I agree. I was shocked at all the extra time too. I’ll have to rewatch the ending.

Did someone run out of bounds. Or incompletions?

I just thought Sark was good at stopping clocks.
Posted by Gator5220
Member since Aug 2010
4723 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 8:15 am to
quote:

I just thought Sark was good at stopping clocks.

Well, Sark had six timeouts in the second half because you know Napier won't take his home with him. Sure enough, he used 2 in the final 3 minutes and I expected him to take one if Texas had scored and went for two.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
39437 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 8:30 am to
quote:

If there is a 10-second runoff the game clock will start on the referee’s signal. If there is no 10-second runoff the game clock will start on the snap.


This is key. The clock was stopped anyway because Sark wasn’t gonna let a 10-second runoff happen. The timeout was only a means to get Barber back in the game.
Posted by Gator5220
Member since Aug 2010
4723 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 8:35 am to
I'm pretty sure a Texas defender lost his helmet too on that play. So if both teams lose a helmet who decides whether there is a runoff?

Texas didn't have any timeouts so does it defer to the team that does?
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
20815 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Texas didn't have any timeouts so does it defer to the team that does?


I believe so
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
7644 posts
Posted on 10/5/25 at 2:06 pm to
I went and enjoyed my time there. Would have had more fun if I still had optimism for this staff/season as a whole, but it was a good time and the crowd brought it.

I did miss the first quarter while charging my phone and watching the end of some of the noon games on my phone near the entrance, but once I got to my seats and got into it, I had a good time.

Gives me some home that if we can hire a competent coach some day that the magic of this program is still there.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter