Started By
Message

What do you guys think about OK State

Posted on 12/27/19 at 9:16 pm
Posted by HalfCocked
Dirty Beach
Member since Jan 2015
2291 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 9:16 pm
I realize it was A&M but they were also down #1QB and #2WR. That happens to us, we lose every single game on the schedule. My question is offensively, what did you guys think? I like the way they run an offense. And that Chubba kid is the next Mcaffrey, he is f'ing fast.


Watching the Wash state vs Air Force game. Sorry but that Air Raid will not work in the SEC. Watch it take a steamy shite every time its in the red zone.
This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 12:23 am
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 12/28/19 at 7:03 am to
They lost
Posted by HalfCocked
Dirty Beach
Member since Jan 2015
2291 posts
Posted on 12/28/19 at 3:25 pm to
Dazzling hot take

How bad do we lose without our #1QB or #2 Receiver, oh wait, we don't have one of those.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 12/28/19 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

How bad do we lose without our #1QB

Well we played the whole season without him

So 4-8


They still lost. So who cares
This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 4:06 pm
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
12168 posts
Posted on 12/28/19 at 7:20 pm to
I guess thats one way of looking for the positive in a loss... which is still a loss.
Posted by HalfCocked
Dirty Beach
Member since Jan 2015
2291 posts
Posted on 12/28/19 at 10:30 pm to
I asked what you dick wads thought about it. I actually find the X's and O's interesting. You know that shite that keeps us from winning games these days. Sorry, we'll get back to discussing exclusively how bad we suck. Considering FSU mad it to a fricking bowl game.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
12168 posts
Posted on 12/29/19 at 9:24 am to
I like your response you will fit in well here however your obsession with X's and O's that lead to a loss is weird as hell.
This post was edited on 12/29/19 at 9:29 am
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 12/29/19 at 11:27 am to
Sure the Xs and Os were great
That lead to a loss
Posted by HalfCocked
Dirty Beach
Member since Jan 2015
2291 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:06 am to
You guys do realize no offensive or defensive scheme is untouchable right? You do realize you need the correct personal to run said scheme correctly right? You do understand why Clemson got their shite pushed in by us running the spread with Taj. Then magically became champions seemingly over night by running it with Watson and then that new chick they've got, right?
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 5:09 am to
quote:

You do understand why Clemson got their shite pushed in by us running the spread with Taj. Then magically became champions seemingly over night by running it with Watson and then that new chick they've got, right?


Clemson didn’t magically get better because of Watson.
Clemson magically got better because they beefed up both lines
Clemson’s DL and OL when playing us was not awful, now it isn’t
In their national title era they’ve had 6 First round draft picks of the defensive side of the ball
This post was edited on 12/30/19 at 5:26 am
Posted by HalfCocked
Dirty Beach
Member since Jan 2015
2291 posts
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:47 pm to
I'm fully aware their success wasn't due solely to Watson. I'm also fully aware they committed lots of money to both lines. My point was scheme doesn't work without the right guys to run it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter