Started By
Message
What do you guys think about OK State
Posted on 12/27/19 at 9:16 pm
Posted on 12/27/19 at 9:16 pm
I realize it was A&M but they were also down #1QB and #2WR. That happens to us, we lose every single game on the schedule. My question is offensively, what did you guys think? I like the way they run an offense. And that Chubba kid is the next Mcaffrey, he is f'ing fast.
Watching the Wash state vs Air Force game. Sorry but that Air Raid will not work in the SEC. Watch it take a steamy shite every time its in the red zone.
Watching the Wash state vs Air Force game. Sorry but that Air Raid will not work in the SEC. Watch it take a steamy shite every time its in the red zone.
This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 12:23 am
Posted on 12/28/19 at 3:25 pm to I Bleed Garnet
Dazzling hot take
How bad do we lose without our #1QB or #2 Receiver, oh wait, we don't have one of those.
How bad do we lose without our #1QB or #2 Receiver, oh wait, we don't have one of those.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 4:05 pm to HalfCocked
quote:
How bad do we lose without our #1QB
Well we played the whole season without him
So 4-8
They still lost. So who cares
This post was edited on 12/28/19 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 12/28/19 at 7:20 pm to HalfCocked
I guess thats one way of looking for the positive in a loss... which is still a loss.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 10:30 pm to SOSFAN
I asked what you dick wads thought about it. I actually find the X's and O's interesting. You know that shite that keeps us from winning games these days. Sorry, we'll get back to discussing exclusively how bad we suck. Considering FSU mad it to a fricking bowl game.
Posted on 12/29/19 at 9:24 am to HalfCocked
I like your response you will fit in well here however your obsession with X's and O's that lead to a loss is weird as hell.
This post was edited on 12/29/19 at 9:29 am
Posted on 12/29/19 at 11:27 am to HalfCocked
Sure the Xs and Os were great
That lead to a loss
That lead to a loss
Posted on 12/30/19 at 12:06 am to I Bleed Garnet
You guys do realize no offensive or defensive scheme is untouchable right? You do realize you need the correct personal to run said scheme correctly right? You do understand why Clemson got their shite pushed in by us running the spread with Taj. Then magically became champions seemingly over night by running it with Watson and then that new chick they've got, right?
Posted on 12/30/19 at 5:09 am to HalfCocked
quote:
You do understand why Clemson got their shite pushed in by us running the spread with Taj. Then magically became champions seemingly over night by running it with Watson and then that new chick they've got, right?
Clemson didn’t magically get better because of Watson.
Clemson magically got better because they beefed up both lines
Clemson’s DL and OL when playing us was not awful, now it isn’t
In their national title era they’ve had 6 First round draft picks of the defensive side of the ball
This post was edited on 12/30/19 at 5:26 am
Posted on 12/30/19 at 11:47 pm to I Bleed Garnet
I'm fully aware their success wasn't due solely to Watson. I'm also fully aware they committed lots of money to both lines. My point was scheme doesn't work without the right guys to run it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News