Started By
Message

All my nightmares have been realized

Posted on 1/9/17 at 11:26 pm
Posted by atlgamecockman
Washington, DC
Member since Dec 2012
3822 posts
Posted on 1/9/17 at 11:26 pm
The worst part of this is that it will ruin Gamecock recruiting in SC for a couple years.

Dabo now gets to say "Come play at a championship program."

Might be a little dramatic to say, but I have much less confidence in XT showing up in Cola now.
This post was edited on 1/9/17 at 11:28 pm
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37574 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:07 am to
Nah, it'll be okay. You can only sign 25 at a time and typically these kind of things have little influence over the short term because, #1 ... this 2017 class is already largely assembled and #2 ... the next class will be assembled largely upon what is being done next season.

Clemson loses a lot.

If Clemson falters in 2017 it will effect their 2018 class.

What this will effect is the classes down the road that are comprised of current 10-12 year olds who just became huge fans of Clemson last night.

The last time this happened, in '81, we saw their 85, 86, 87 classes really boom. Now, some of that was because they immediately went under investigation and were placed on probation in '82 and '83 ... who knows, it could happen again because we know they are cheating on some level, but these days kids are committing much earlier than back in those days so this class will not be hugely affected by what happened last night.

The key is to beat them, plain and simple. We have to beat them. Kids have short memories.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:25 am to
People like to compare them to Oregon.

But the truth is, if Kelly didn't leave Oregon, they'd still be rolling.

If they lose Dabo they will fall.

But I don't see that happening right now.


LINK
This post was edited on 1/10/17 at 11:29 am
Posted by WheelRoute
Washington, D.C.
Member since Oct 2013
1811 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:14 pm to
Honestly, where would Dabo go? He can win at Clemson as he showed last nite, and he is now a deity there for doing so. I don't think the NFL comes calling, either.

What's with his coordinators? Why haven't they moved on? That's the best we can hope for short term.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Honestly, where would Dabo go?


Exactly.

Posted by chawk195
Spartanburg, SC
Member since Feb 2015
1174 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:58 pm to
Eh, at some point he'll go home to Bama when Saban leaves.

What I want to happen, Brent Venables and the o coordinators get HC jobs and then we see what dabo is made of as a coach.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

at some point he'll go home to Bama when Saban leaves.


That could happen
Posted by Carolina Tide
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2013
5747 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 7:01 pm to
That's been the word for some time now, what with him being from Pelham and graduating from Bama.


I'm curious to see what they'll do once Watson leaves. Part of me feel like they'll pull an Auburn and more or less fall off the face of earth once Cam left. We'll see what happens.


All I know is that it's REALLY hard to repeat as national champs. I know that all too well........
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 7:03 pm to
I don't think they'll repeat, but this is a lot different than Cam and auburn in my opinion.
That team was built overnight when Cam transferred there, that team wasn't recruiting on Clemson's level either. Clemson also plays an easier schedule than Auburn
Posted by Carolina Tide
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2013
5747 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 7:13 pm to
True they have been recruiting lights out recently but I still feel like they'll miss Watson more than they'll care to admit.

Plus next year they'll have auburn and fsu at home and Louisville,NCState,VT and y'all on the road. The target on their backs will be huge and they'll be getting everyone's best shot, week after week. Also believe it or not the ACC might be deeper next year. More so than the SEC.

They Cant play the underdog role, or the "we're being disrespected" card anymore. They're the hunted.
This post was edited on 1/10/17 at 7:15 pm
Posted by UpstateCock2007
Columbia, SC
Member since Mar 2009
7717 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 7:30 pm to
Watson is a once in a generation player. They will take a step back but still have plenty of talent to win 10 games in the ACC. Their defense will be nasty, especially the D-Line, but there is no way their offense will produce like the past two years.
Posted by KingSlayer
Member since May 2015
2854 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:58 pm to
Sadly, I think some of you guys are kidding yourself. Clemson isn't going to fall off, or even take a step back. They play in a 2 team conference, they are now considered an elite program, and they have been recruiting lights out for several years. They are going to be one game away from the playoffs nearly every year for a while. We were ahead of them and could have helped keep them from this run, but we chose to not fight hard for recruits for a few years after we got Clowney. The golf course and over confidence in our ability to coach up players led us to sitting on our laurels while Dabo was trying to improve their recruiting every year. We're going to have to really step up our game in every aspect or it could be tough living here for a while.
Posted by Foolish cock
South Cak
Member since Dec 2012
2529 posts
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Sadly, I think some of you guys are kidding yourself. Clemson isn't going to fall off, or even take a step back.



Dear god, i could die.

I agree wholeheartedly, and it makes me sick. I am depressed , digisted, and dispondent. We are light years away. More later Too sad to discus now.
This post was edited on 1/10/17 at 11:07 pm
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:36 am to
Sadly, I think some of you guys are kidding yourself. Clemson isn't going to fall off

I agree.

"Fall off" for them will be 9-3
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37574 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Sadly, I think some of you guys are kidding yourself. Clemson isn't going to fall off, or even take a step back.


They will not fall off ... but it will be very difficult for them not to take a step back. A step back is not winning a national championship. Two steps back is not making the playoffs.

It's tougher to do than it's been made to appear to be able to do the past couple of years.

quote:

They play in a 2 team conference, they are now considered an elite program, and they have been recruiting lights out for several years.


Here's the thing about that KingSlayer. Everyone has been saying the SEC is a one team conference for years now. It's not correct.

Clemson will have to face FSU every year. They've got Louisville whenever, and NC State and Va Tech and UNC and Notre Dame from time-to-time but yeah, that's not as strong as the SEC or SEC West or even the SEC East probably ... but it's tough to stay perfect playing big boy football in the South.

quote:

They are going to be one game away from the playoffs nearly every year for a while.


Like Ohio State, Bama, et al? Listen Brother ... it's been that way since the beginning of time. It all goes in cycles. FSU won the ACC how many years in a row before they finally lost it? How many years outta how many years ... was it 14 out of 18 or something like that? Everyone was outraged, for years, that FSU had an unfettered path to the BCS game and even before the BCS ... hell, ask Charlie Bloom - The BCS was basically devised to stop FSU from just waltzing-in to the championship every year.

For those that are unaware ... Charles Bloom, who now works for us, was the architect of the BCS format while working for Roy Kramer.

quote:

We were ahead of them and could have helped keep them from this run, but we chose to not fight hard for recruits for a few years after we got Clowney.


Ehhhhhhhhhh, I dunno about that. I mean I get where you, and many others, are coming from but that's not necessarily 100% correct.

It's been well documented, and admitted-to, that some of our coaches rested on their laurels - no doubt about it ... but that had far more to do with us than anything Clemson was doing differently at the time that we might have had an affect on KingSlayer - or that we might have been able to take advantage of from our own perspective.

They are cheating, there is no doubt about it, they are cheating. They are really good at it, they always have been. Their cheat network is incredible.

History reminder. 1975 and Jeff Grantz beats their brakes off. Clemson supporters went ballistic. They started paying recruits the next day ... win at all costs. Now, we had surpassed them for all practical purposes. If you check modern history from post 1945 to 1975 we led the series, or it was close to even ... I'd have to go back and look but the series was in our favor, if I am not mistaken during that time frame, and trending even further in our favor. But after '75 they started paying players in a big way and everyone knew it ... especially through the Inhabinet fella, the Pepsi bottler or whatever he was. Vince Dooley and Jim Carlen, all the ACC coaches, Bill Battle and Johnny Majors ... everyone was complaining about Clemson cheating. Matter of fact it was Johnny Majors and some recruits in Knoxville that finally brought Clemson down back then ... to some degree.

quote:

The golf course and over confidence in our ability to coach up players led us to sitting on our laurels while Dabo was trying to improve their recruiting every year.


Two things.

Spurrier said it best ... he stayed past his expiration date. We have to blame part of that on Ray Tanner.

Secondly ... the Clemson thing was already in motion. The pieces just happened to fall into place. They paid the right people, got the right players, etc., and we in no way could have had any effect on the outcome these past couple of years. To be cliche', the writing was already on the wall.

quote:

We're going to have to really step up our game in every aspect or it could be tough living here for a while.


You are 100% correct. We ARE going to have to step-up our game. That's the beauty of all of this - it raises the standards. How we go about meeting the challenge is another story.

Compared to Clemson, one of the cheatingest programs in the history of the NCAA and that's just a fact .... our program is squeaky clean. And under Spurrier it was off-limits to do anything to potentially harm his legacy. He despised FSU for their cheating and he knew full well that Clemson was/is cheating.

Will Muschamp be willing to get in the game ... that game? Should he? Should big money boosters? Should the Gamecock Club start a secret organization to deliver payments?

Is that the only way to get to the promised land?

There are a lot of factors that go into recruiting and signing the right players to fit a system and then coaching them up ... we shouldn't have to get on a level of payola that Clemson and some others are on in order to compete for championships.

I think Muschamp, the more I see what he is doing, I think Muschamp is going to get it done the right way - we're just going to have to be patient and demanding at the same time.

Trust me, this Dabo thing will falter at Clemson eventually, probably sooner rather than later. He's like the Jimmy Swaggart or Jim Bakker of college football. Dabo's fall will be epic and shocking when it comes.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

They are cheating, there is no doubt about it, they are cheating. They are really good at it, they always have been. Their cheat network is incredible.



So I ask this? Why Can't we?

It's simple really. Do you think a national title winner is 100% clean?
Look at the passed couple winners.
Bama, OSU, Auburn, Clemson, FSU, Florida, USC (who in fact had it taken away), Texas.


Throw in a team like Oregon too who came into play with the Nike money. (I think they just suck now because they can't find a guy to coach, need to bring Chip back)

ALL of those programs have had question marks next to them.

I truly don't think you can win a title clean. I would take a season that is 5 years down the road vacated.

Because at the end of the day, I experienced that season, and you can't take my memory of it away.

This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 1:32 pm
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37574 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:36 pm to
A lot of fans feel that way these days ... especially given the toothless NCAA bark regarding egregious cheating by UNC.

So ... I mean, maybe. Who knows. The network has to be put in place. It's a complicated process. Takes big money ... cash and commodities.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Takes big money ... cash and commodities.


From a LEGAL standpoint.

When I donate my money to the Gamecock club, is there a way I can say... I WANT THIS ONLY GOING TO FOOTBALL?

Also, I know it's not totally legal to just say money goes to football with Title IX and all. And I know it'S pretty tough to really circumvent that (I would say now days more teams would get busted for Title IX violations over paying recruits with a slush fund)
But what is the smallest amount you are allowed to fund other sports?

Is there some kind of report that tells how much everyone allocates funds?
There's NO Way Clemson, Bama etc allocate the funds the same percentages as we do.

This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 6:57 am
Posted by KingSlayer
Member since May 2015
2854 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 8:02 am to
quote:

They will not fall off ... but it will be very difficult for them not to take a step back. A step back is not winning a national championship. Two steps back is not making the playoffs.


I would disagree slightly. Would you say Alabama took a step back this year because they came up 5 seconds short? I wouldn't. To me getting to the playoffs is the goal, winning takes good matchups and luck. If Clemson wins the ACC and makes the playoffs and doesn't win, in my opinion that would not be a step back any more than us losing to Arizona in the CWS finals was not us taking a step back.

quote:

Clemson will have to face FSU every year. They've got Louisville whenever, and NC State and Va Tech and UNC and Notre Dame from time-to-time but yeah, that's not as strong as the SEC or SEC West or even the SEC East probably ... but it's tough to stay perfect playing big boy football in the South.


Reality is, no one in the ACC other than Florida St has won anything of note in a long time. Sure Clemson may stumble against a Pitt, but the truth is if they beat Florida St they likely are going to win the ACC. On the flip side, if they lose to Florida St they probably have little chance at winning the ACC. It's a much easier path for them than teams in most any other conferences.

quote:

Like Ohio State, Bama, et al? Listen Brother ... it's been that way since the beginning of time. It all goes in cycles. FSU won the ACC how many years in a row before they finally lost it? How many years outta how many years ... was it 14 out of 18 or something like that? Everyone was outraged, for years, that FSU had an unfettered path to the BCS game and even before the BCS ... hell, ask Charlie Bloom - The BCS was basically devised to stop FSU from just waltzing-in to the championship every year.


Ye, it's always been that way for the elite. Clemson has never been one of those elite, now they are. It makes me want to vomit in my mouth to see the level they have reached.


(ETA: Hit Submit too soon.)


This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 8:08 am
Posted by GameCocky88
Mount Pleasant, SC
Member since Dec 2015
4837 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 9:21 am to
OK here are my 2 cents.

Regarding Recruiting

I don't think winning the Championship will significantly change their recruiting one way or another. They have been recruiting at a high level for the past couple of years. They have been able to cherry pick top talent from across the US before Monday so that isn't likely to be as much of a factor as it is being made to seem. As far as in state guys, yeah it might hold a little weight but for XT in specific I don't think it is as much of a problem. Everything from what the recruiting sites are saying to what he himself is posting on Twitter etc, it looks like he genuinely wants to come here. Granted if you have the National Champs right up the road you are going to have some interest in their program. What I think is important right now isn't as much as them winning and our record or even team improvement. I think it is being able to point to guys like Kier Thomas and Wonnum and saying these guys played as freshman and had an impact and here is the improvement they were able to make under our staff in the two years between them coming here and XT's NSD. Now all of that being said, I can't say that the other top tier guys in SC will be like that.

Where do they go from here?

I think the notion that they don't at least take some what of a step back is foolish. Watson is a ridiculously good player and to think that replacing the likes of him and WRs like Scott and Williams will go off without a hitch is nonsense. Yes they will be very good, yes they could/should still win the ACC, but I would not be shocked to see them out of the top 4 come playoff time next year. And that is mainly because it is next to impossible to do if you lose more than one game.

Conclusion

It was always going to take several years for us to be able to restock the shelves to get us where we need to be to consistently compete in recruiting and on the field with these guys coming from where we fell. And by compete in recruiting I mean compete for talent that didn't "Grow up a Gamecock or Tiger" I mean for kids who have no allegiance to either program and we win based off of relationships built and on field performance. If there was something to be learned from all of this it is this: a HC in todays CFB needs to be a 1) top notch tireless relentless recruiter and 2) hire staff that he trusts to do their job and recruit at a high level as well and 3) develop a team wide buy in. While Saban does get credit from everyone for having the X's and O's knowledge, that isn't something that Dabo is necessarily known for. The development of WRs has gone up significantly there since turning those reigns over to Jeff Scott. This is where I see Muschamp having the most trouble, can he allow TRob to have control over the Defense so that he (Muschamp) can free up some additional time for recruiting/team buy in etc? Idk.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter