Favorite team:South Carolina 
Location:Nola
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:4408
Registered on:12/2/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

lol the NYT? Have we not learned that every single word they type is a lie. I’m thrilled it means Iran has nothing



It must be amazing to live in a world where you can just dismiss information out of hand if you don't like where it's coming from.
quote:

Eh, I will be long gone...no care



Wise men plant trees in whose shade they will never sit
They have to play it in that slot because no one wants to come to Nola when it's 95 degrees and 100% humidity

re: Redistricting

Posted by atlgamecockman on 5/6/26 at 12:26 pm to
In practice it's largely done by whichever party has power with a long term view towards preserving incumbents and the majority in power in the state houses.

It's distasteful to most people because it's shifting the chips to one team vs another. It's not an even playing field. Rightly some districts have been unconstitutional due to race being the primary reasons for lines drawn.

It should be by population density, done by computers. End of discussion. The human element is too prone to self preservation via redistricting games rather than hard work of winning voters.
Way to not refute the point ... give yourself a pat on the back
reading this thread is like watching a blind man trying to find a hand hold.

The blind man is the MAGA cult members and the hand hold is whatever coalescent talking point that hasn't yet been put out by the cult leaders.
quote:

shithole


cultural center of the south oops.

Also this might be why

LINK

quote:

By the time the governor pushed the date of the race from May 16 to July 15, more than 42,000 absentee votes had already been received, the Louisiana Illuminator reported Monday


Potentially invalidating votes already received in an ongoing election? Super democratic.
Wonder if he'll do Shreve, Issa, McCormick, McCaul etc. Big time traders in Congress...
I'm 100% for the computer-drawn maps. Gerrymandering is a bad way of doing business regardless matter who is doing it, be it Dems in IL or GOP in TX.

But without an independent commission doing the lines on a state by state basis, you are going to have both parties further entrenching themselves with these nutty maps. It's voter suppression, and it's wrong.

That opinion does not preclude the earlier post I made
I think that is admirable but the VRA was put into place because certain states couldn't be trusted to not racially discriminate or like I said, protect the power gained through that discrimination and segregation.

Not sure what changed to make the SCOTUS decide that I guess the southern states should be free to continue that protective insular behavior, but they did.

And if you think the south is some post-racial "everyone is all equal" place, I suggest you peruse this very board and read some of the general thoughts on race, especially black Americans here.
quote:

Feed total population by county into a map and let a computer spit out the congressional districts based on nothing but population and geography.

Tell both parties to kick sand and that their candidates can go out and try to win the districts where they live if they want to be in Congress.

This process doesn’t have to be complicated or corrupt. The candidates will bring enough of that to the table themselves.



Amen.
lol

Republicans - "We didn’t create this new districting map with the intent to racially discriminate; we created it to perpetuate and protect political incumbency and power structures created from past racial discrimination. That doesn’t violate Sec. 2 of VRA"
This again? Hey Grok... did racist southern democrats stay democrats or move to the republican party?

quote:

The short answer is: both happened, but over time many white Southern voters (including those with segregationist views) shifted toward the Republican Party—while many individual politicians initially stayed Democrats before gradually realigning.

Here’s the clearer breakdown:

1. Before the shift: the “Solid South” was Democratic

For decades after the Civil War, the South was dominated by the Democratic Party. Many white Southern Democrats supported segregation and Jim Crow laws. This was the political landscape leading into the Civil Rights Movement.

2. The turning point: civil rights legislation (1960s)

Major laws like the Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965) were passed under Democratic leadership, including Lyndon B. Johnson. These laws pushed the national Democratic Party firmly toward civil rights.

This created a political break:

Many white Southern voters felt alienated from the Democratic Party
Black voters in the South began overwhelmingly supporting Democrats

3. What happened to Southern Democrats?

Voters:
A large share of white Southern voters gradually moved to the Republican Party over several decades (not overnight). This shift accelerated from the late 1960s through the 1990s and beyond.

Politicians:
It was more mixed:

Some switched parties, like Strom Thurmond, who left the Democrats for Republicans in 1964
Others stayed Democrats for years or decades, even while holding conservative or segregationist views
Over time, newer generations of Southern politicians increasingly ran as Republicans

4. The role of the Southern Strategy

Republican campaigns, especially under Richard Nixon, used messaging that appealed to disaffected white Southern voters (e.g., “law and order,” “states’ rights”). This helped accelerate voter realignment, even if not all politicians switched immediately.

5. The end result (long-term)

By the late 20th and early 21st century:

The South became solidly Republican at the federal level
The Democratic Party became more associated with civil rights and a multiracial coalition
The Republican Party became dominant among white Southern voters

Bottom line
Many white Southern voters moved to the Republican Party over time
Some politicians switched parties, but many stayed Democrats for a while before the region fully realigned

It wasn’t a single moment or mass switch—it was a gradual political realignment over several decades.



Party of Lincoln indeed
quote:


What leftist stances of any organization have I defended on this board?



Any commentary about the substance of the actual indictment is defense of leftists because it might reveal the shoddy work done by the "excellent" leaders of this iteration FBI and DOJ.

Same issue the true believers have with the tariffs. Trump wanted to do it unilateraly outside Congress, told his people to do that, and they went with a statute that doesn't support the position at all. Then when the substance is actually examined under the law, turns out, it was shite work and shouldn't have been used.

It wasn't that their legal reasoning sucked, any criticism of it is viewed as "anti-trump" .

Nuance is not a real thing on the Poli board ha.
Blanche trying to quash it. He is Trumps guy... won't let anything else out.

Did you read your own link retard?

quote:

“Sam,” a 22-year-old orthopedic surgeon in training, told Wired that he got the idea to sell AI-generated images of a young woman in a bikini while scrounging for money in school — and trying to save up enough to emigrate to the US after graduation.