Started By
Message

re: And here we go…LSU will require vax proof for entry into Tiger Stadium

Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:23 pm to
Posted by TSM
Member since Nov 2020
7 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

US 7th Circuit ruled 3-0 in favor of Indiana University COVI-19 mandates. The 3 Justices were all Strict Conservative Juris, 1 a Reagan appointee and 2 Trump appointees. SCOTUS Associate Justice Barrett, another Trump appointee denied the appeal of the IU students thus it was not deemed necessary for the SCOTUS to hear the appeal. The 7th Circuit ruling cited legal precedent from a 1905 case where SCOTUS ruled in favor of the State of Massachusetts vs. a group of MA residents to mandate the small pox vaccine.

If Trial lawyers try this they are very bad lawyers as the Federal Courts have already ruled that States have under the 10th amendment powers of having local policing powers to issue health mandates.

I am an LSU season ticket holder and I am, after consultation with my Doctor, vaccinated. Still undecided if I will go to LSU home games early on, first 2 games. Likely wait and see how things here shake out and plan on going to the LSU/Auburn game first week in October and show my vaccine proof to enter.

People who don't agree with LSU's Regulations, that is their right and business, an stay home and watch it on TV.


That's not correct. They ruled only on the TRO, not the merits of the case.
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15475 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:25 pm to
I mean this is just amazing that we are at this point in the country, a country that landed a man on the freaking moon (oh wait thats fake too), where people believe Aunt Vickie's post on Facebook over the advice of their own doctor.
Posted by JKChesterton
Member since Dec 2012
4014 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

That's not correct. They ruled only on the TRO, not the merits of the case.



LINK /

Per Reuters, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Case 21-2326 ruled the IU mandate did not violate a Constitutional right

So either Reuters misquoted what was ruled or you are incorrect. Or like many people, they are all for the Constitution until it does not agree with their ex ante held beliefs.

Judge Easterbrook cited the 1905 SCOTUS decision in favor of the state of MA and Smallpox vaccine. He stated clearly you don't have to go to IU and could go elsewhere.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter