It's Larry Coker. They should have had a dynasty. So many good players, coaching competition was way down in the early 00's, they were right smack in the middle of the most fertile recruiting area in the nation. The move to the ACC should have cemented them into the elite, but he fricked it up so hard. Chizik is a good shout, but he beat a well seasoned Nick Saban, and Chip Kelly at his peak in 2010. Also beat Spurrier at his peak.

A lot of you are trolling with Les Miles. Won a natty, and would have had another one if the pollsters hadn't fricked up so bad in 2011. Jimbo? That's definitely a troll job.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Globetrotter747

Member since Sep 2017

4347 posts

Posted on 8/15/21 at 3:43 pm to ptclaus98

quote:
It's Larry Coker. They should have had a dynasty. So many good players, coaching competition was way down in the early 00's, they were right smack in the middle of the most fertile recruiting area in the nation.

1. They did have good players and Coker won a lot of games with them. He was a controversial call away from back to back undefeated national titles in his first two years.

2. Great college players only stay 3-4 years, and he won for 3-4 years.

3. If it's so easy to win at Miami, how come no one other than Coker has even coached in a national title since 1992? The days when it was cool for south Florida kids to stay home and play in the old Orange Bowl stadium are ancient history.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by GBJs