Started By
Message
re: So A&M was left in the dark, then fiercely fought against expansions…then bent the knee?
Posted on 7/30/21 at 11:43 am to aggressor
Posted on 7/30/21 at 11:43 am to aggressor
quote:
Meh. A&M was told they would have veto power when we came to the conference. Obviously things change and this is a much bigger picture now but I don't think it is unreasonable that A&M was pissed and felt betrayed to an extent.
Texas AM did not have veto power, to bring another school in takes 11 out of 14 votes. Remember one school, one vote, and UF, USCe, UK, UGA all decide to say yes.
I have a very hard time believing that Texas AM did not know about this months in advance. Texas AM was not backstabbed by the other schools in the SEC, but by their own athletic department (or President and BOR)
1
Posted on 7/30/21 at 11:54 am to TideFaninFl
quote:
I have a very hard time believing that Texas AM did not know about this months in advance. Texas AM was not backstabbed by the other schools in the SEC, but by their own athletic department (or President and BOR)
they did not know months in advance.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News