Started By
Message

re: Braden Smith gets 4 year 72 million extension

Posted on 7/28/21 at 3:43 pm to
Posted by metafour
Member since Feb 2007
3611 posts
Posted on 7/28/21 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Not really. I dont care if he played Hback. As long as it was where he was needed.



Of course you don't care. But surely you can follow the trail and connect the dots: if we couldn't even evaluate Braden Smith as a Tackle (a more valuable position on the OL), don't you think that sheds light on why that position group for the past 3+ years has been an absolute disaster? Or perhaps why we had to convert a DT (Alec Jackson) to play LT?
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
63594 posts
Posted on 7/28/21 at 4:20 pm to
What does it matter. You are going to turn every single post in every single thread into a Gus sucked post so what’s the point.

Carry on brother. Do your thing.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
21216 posts
Posted on 7/29/21 at 6:24 am to
quote:

if we couldn't even evaluate Braden Smith as a Tackle (a more valuable position on the OL), don't you think that sheds light on why that position group for the past 3+ years has been an absolute disaster? Or perhaps why we had to convert a DT (Alec Jackson) to play LT?


That’s not how it works though. I’m still drinking my first cup of coffee and not thinking in-depth on those teams, so tifwiw. But you put the best team on the field. It’s very possible Auburn had players that were much better at tackle then guard so Braden Smith at tackle was the best for the team. It’s not about only putting your stars at their best position, if that compromises your team.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter