Started By
Message
re: Braden Smith gets 4 year 72 million extension
Posted on 7/28/21 at 3:43 pm to LanierSpots
Posted on 7/28/21 at 3:43 pm to LanierSpots
quote:
Not really. I dont care if he played Hback. As long as it was where he was needed.
Of course you don't care. But surely you can follow the trail and connect the dots: if we couldn't even evaluate Braden Smith as a Tackle (a more valuable position on the OL), don't you think that sheds light on why that position group for the past 3+ years has been an absolute disaster? Or perhaps why we had to convert a DT (Alec Jackson) to play LT?
Posted on 7/28/21 at 4:20 pm to metafour
What does it matter. You are going to turn every single post in every single thread into a Gus sucked post so what’s the point.
Carry on brother. Do your thing.
Carry on brother. Do your thing.
Posted on 7/29/21 at 6:24 am to metafour
quote:
if we couldn't even evaluate Braden Smith as a Tackle (a more valuable position on the OL), don't you think that sheds light on why that position group for the past 3+ years has been an absolute disaster? Or perhaps why we had to convert a DT (Alec Jackson) to play LT?
That’s not how it works though. I’m still drinking my first cup of coffee and not thinking in-depth on those teams, so tifwiw. But you put the best team on the field. It’s very possible Auburn had players that were much better at tackle then guard so Braden Smith at tackle was the best for the team. It’s not about only putting your stars at their best position, if that compromises your team.
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News