Started By
Message

re: Pods are Dumb

Posted on 7/22/21 at 8:39 pm to
Posted by TomRollTideRitter
Member since Aug 2016
12619 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

A pod system keeps a good number of the rivalries but also allows everyone to play everyone home and home every 4 years.


How does 3 permanent + 6 rotating not accomplish this? 3 permanent allows you to tailor each team’s rivals.

Alabama and Auburn should play.
Auburn and UGA should play.
Alabama and UT should play.
UT and Vandy should play.

Pods can’t accomplish that.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84887 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 8:41 pm to
3 permanent opponents is a pod smart guy, but you can’t make the schedule work reasonably with THAT many moving parts.

I’m not sure even an advanced AI could come up with a schedule rotation that takes into account circular permanent opponents like that.
This post was edited on 7/22/21 at 8:43 pm
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
7330 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

TomRollTideRitter
Pods are Dumb

quote:
A pod system keeps a good number of the rivalries but also allows everyone to play everyone home and home every 4 years.



How does 3 permanent + 6 rotating not accomplish this? 3 permanent allows you to tailor each team’s rivals.

Alabama and Auburn should play.
Auburn and UGA should play.
Alabama and UT should play.
UT and Vandy should play.

Pods can’t accomplish that.



Pods CAN accomplish this.

Each team has 1 rival in each of the other pods:
A1/B1/C1/D1 rivals
A2/B2/C2/D2 rivals
A3/B3/C3/D3 rivals
A4/B4/C4/D4 rivals

Now pair up the pods yearly
Y1 - AB & CD
Y2 - AC & BD
Y3 - AD & BC

Everybody now has 9 conf. games.
ex. for team A1:

Y1 - A2, A3, A4, B1 (rival), B2, B3, B4, C1 (rival), D1 (rival)
Y2 - A2, A3, A4, C1 (rival), C2, C3, C4, B1 (rival), D1 (rival)
Y3 - A2, A3, A4, D1 (rival), D2, D3, D4, B1 (rival), C1 (rival)

I guess you'ld say mine has 6 perm. & 3 yearly rotating.
This post was edited on 7/22/21 at 9:11 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67198 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:12 pm to
Pods are literally just the simplified version of the system you are describing.

Here’s the complicated version you want:
Texas: LSU, A&M, Oklahoma
Oklahoma: Arkansas, Texas, and Mizzou
Arkansas: Mizzou, Texas A&M, and Oklahoma
Texas A&M: Texas, Arkansas, and LSU
Mizzou: Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Kentucky

Ole Miss: LSU, Vanderbilt, and Miss St
LSU: Texas A&M, Ole Miss, and Texas
Miss St: Ole Miss, Kentucky, and Alabama
Alabama: Miss St, Tennessee, and Auburn
Tennessee: Vanderbilt, Alabama, and Florida
Auburn: Alabama, Georgia, Florida
Florida: Auburn, Georgia, Tennessee
Georgia: Florida, Auburn, South Carolina
Vanderbilt: Tennessee, South Carolina, Ole Miss
Kentucky: Miss St, south Carolina, and Mizzou
South Carolina: Vanderbilt, Kentucky, Georgia
Posted by ChadThundercock
Germany
Member since Mar 2020
554 posts
Posted on 7/23/21 at 4:17 am to
quote:

Alabama and Auburn should play.
Auburn and UGA should play.
Alabama and UT should play.
UT and Vandy should play.

Pods can’t accomplish that.

Exactly. I don’t understand why people don’t see this as the best option. Auburn’s 3 permanent rivals don’t have to be the same as Alabama’s 3 permanent rivals. It’s literally what we already do for basketball scheduling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter