Started By
Message
re: Has LSU passed Tennessee in terms of Tradition.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 9:50 am to Old Money
Posted on 7/8/21 at 9:50 am to Old Money
quote:
Also, I swear Tennessee did not claim 6 titles years ago. I remember much less.
They only claimed 1951 and 1998 for the longest time, then, out of nowhere, had 4 additional claims. IMO, if you don’t have a #1 ranking in the AP, UPI, Coaches, BCS, or CFP then your claim is bullshite
The retro-active claiming of national titles is pathetic
This post was edited on 7/8/21 at 9:51 am
Posted on 7/8/21 at 9:57 am to lsufball19
quote:
The retro-active claiming of national titles is pathetic
You can thank Alabama. They started the trend LINK
![](https://i.imgur.com/6tu7anm.jpg)
Posted on 7/8/21 at 10:00 am to lsufball19
quote:
They only claimed 1951 and 1998 for the longest time, then, out of nowhere, had 4 additional claims. IMO, if you don’t have a #1 ranking in the AP, UPI, Coaches, BCS, or CFP then your claim is bullshite
The retro-active claiming of national titles is pathetic
Right, I knew something was off. When we played them at Neyland stadium like 5-6 years ago I noticed the 6 titles and was so confused.
I couldn’t remember if it was 2 or 4. 2 to 6 titles is such a ridiculously large jump
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 7/8/21 at 10:14 am to lsufball19
So who is champion before 1936?
Posted on 7/8/21 at 10:16 am to lsufball19
quote:
They only claimed 1951 and 1998 for the longest time, then, out of nowhere, had 4 additional claims. IMO, if you don’t have a #1 ranking in the AP, UPI, Coaches, BCS, or CFP then your claim is bull shite
The retro-active claiming of national titles is pathetic
SDS did Podcast episode about this last summer. TN had an AD that claimed a Natty for no reason other than to add more prestige. He wasn't shy about that either.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)