Started By
Message

re: Myth: "The BCS/CFP ruined college football by making all other bowl games irrelevant."

Posted on 1/4/21 at 8:39 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 1/4/21 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

What am I missing?


The fact that before the BCS/CFP fewer programs actually cared about the MNC. The goal for most teams was to win the conference, go to a good bowl game and, if they were lucky, get voted #1 by one of the major polls. ESPN changed all that. Over the last 20 years it became more about who was #1 than it did anything else. Less attention was paid to the other bowl games as a result. Now they are all but irrelevant.
Posted by CaptainMorgan
Member since Oct 2007
1509 posts
Posted on 1/4/21 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Over the last 20 years it became more about who was #1 than it did anything else. Less attention was paid to the other bowl games as a result. Now they are all but irrelevant.


Since when has any sport not been about winning? What team doesn’t want to finish #1 when they start their season? I’d disagree that it has anything to with the competitive nature of the sport and point to the fact the we now have 40 bowl games, many of which have been added in your 20 year time frame. A bowl game used to mean something. Now, when you’re an NFL prospect, who cares about playing in the weed eater bowl for a 7-6 team?

There have been other changes in player’s perception of their value and an increase in awareness of the gains/losses they expect from an NFL future due to an injury in an exhibition, but bowl season lost its luster when it became a watered down, uninteresting, money grab for the networks trying to show as much football as possible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter