Started By
Message
re: Why Mac Jones will win the Heisman per PFF!
Posted on 12/4/20 at 6:32 pm to Todd Greene
Posted on 12/4/20 at 6:32 pm to Todd Greene
Trask is #3 in Total QBR.
6th in Pass Efficiency.
#1 in Touchdown Passes.
PFF had him ranked sixth in the SEC.
Had him ranked 48th before this season.
Imagine how hard it was for them to finally rank him in the top 5 QBs, and how good he has had to be to get there. I really do think that at the QB position they simply want to draw clicks and attention.
We're not talking about that, and that isn't actually how PFF works.
The reason their statistics didn't predict Trask is because of several flaws in their metrics.
Throwing into coverage that results in a Touchdown is still considered a negative play even though the output was positive. Throwing downfield less often results in a poor rating, so when Trask takes a checkdown because the defense is playing Cloud-3 coverage all game to stop him from going deep, this is looked at as negative and his receivers are actually the reason he's successful.
They have basically been punishing him for taking the right read because it doesn't gel with their idiotic metrics at the QB position.
Trask last year was ranked in the top 15 in every passing category and was ranked 48th coming into this year, it's clear that they have failed to accurately measure him for a while, and as I posted above literally had a hit piece out to explain why Trask wasn't a good Quarterback.
PFF is straight buns, my guy.
6th in Pass Efficiency.
#1 in Touchdown Passes.
PFF had him ranked sixth in the SEC.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Had him ranked 48th before this season.
Imagine how hard it was for them to finally rank him in the top 5 QBs, and how good he has had to be to get there. I really do think that at the QB position they simply want to draw clicks and attention.
quote:
So, his #'s mean very little to the pros. Except for his accuracy and comp. % and total qbr! Medical/Mental, Physical attributes, fooot work,arm strength, release, vision etc...
We're not talking about that, and that isn't actually how PFF works.
The reason their statistics didn't predict Trask is because of several flaws in their metrics.
Throwing into coverage that results in a Touchdown is still considered a negative play even though the output was positive. Throwing downfield less often results in a poor rating, so when Trask takes a checkdown because the defense is playing Cloud-3 coverage all game to stop him from going deep, this is looked at as negative and his receivers are actually the reason he's successful.
They have basically been punishing him for taking the right read because it doesn't gel with their idiotic metrics at the QB position.
Trask last year was ranked in the top 15 in every passing category and was ranked 48th coming into this year, it's clear that they have failed to accurately measure him for a while, and as I posted above literally had a hit piece out to explain why Trask wasn't a good Quarterback.
PFF is straight buns, my guy.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)