Started By
Message

re: Serious Question for Officials

Posted on 10/12/20 at 9:30 am to
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30600 posts
Posted on 10/12/20 at 9:30 am to
quote:

A ball thrown backwards isn't an incomplete pass, it's a lateral/fumble.


BINGO!
The QB had his back to the line of scrimmage when he spiked the ball, therefore it's a live ball(fumble) and in play.
The fact that this play was allowed even after review is wrong on so many levels, it makes the whole thing seem totally underhanded.
This post was edited on 10/12/20 at 9:31 am
Posted by War Eagle 777
Georgia
Member since Nov 2010
216 posts
Posted on 10/12/20 at 9:37 am to
I was not defending that particular call. I was just curious why the rule exists? BTW I don't think it does in the NFL
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
17328 posts
Posted on 10/12/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

The QB had his back to the line of scrimmage when he spiked the ball, therefore it's a live ball(fumble) and in play.
The fact that this play was allowed even after review is wrong on so many levels, it makes the whole thing seem totally underhanded.

Pretty much what happened is the ref blew the whistle and threw the flag immediately as he saw Nix drop the snap, negating the spike option. He didn’t note at the time that Nix had turned away from the LOS, turning the play into a fumble.

What replay should have done is ruled it a fumble with an inadvertent whistle resulting in no clear recovery, as play had completely stopped by the time Faucha grabbed the loose ball. Possession would have remained with AU at the spot if the initial fumble - in other words, exactly where it ended up following the IG penalty.

tl;dr - Ref blew the initial call, but the only difference would be the clock would have started running sooner, giving AU slightly less time to line up for a FG (but the game. clock would have been :27 instead of :17 since there was no penalty therefore no runoff).
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 10/12/20 at 10:19 am to
quote:

QB had his back to the line of scrimmage when he spiked the ball,


No it wasnt

quote:

The fact that this play was allowed even after review is wrong on so many levels


The ball traveled backwards, from his release, maybe a foot tops and spike parallel to his back foot, so it not like it was a clear backwards pass at the moment.

As for the recovery, when the whistles were blown, no one was in possession. it was sitting next to ref, when last arky and auburn guy jump on it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter