Started By
Message
re: Why no "criminal" namecalling for any of these stories?
Posted on 8/6/08 at 10:55 pm to caribG8R
Posted on 8/6/08 at 10:55 pm to caribG8R
Slightly clearer headed UGA blogging:
"The point is that Adams may be right, he may be wrong, but he's definitely transparent. If the man's not squashing sour grapes, he's tip-toeing on grapes that are slightly past their prime. The fact that he chose the day of the BCS National Championship to make these comments is not coincidental, either.
... Am I being too harsh on the guy? Or is this just another prance into the limelight by a guy whose motives always seem suspect, even among those in red and black?"
(Hat tip: MaconDawg at dawgsports.com)
"The point is that Adams may be right, he may be wrong, but he's definitely transparent. If the man's not squashing sour grapes, he's tip-toeing on grapes that are slightly past their prime. The fact that he chose the day of the BCS National Championship to make these comments is not coincidental, either.
... Am I being too harsh on the guy? Or is this just another prance into the limelight by a guy whose motives always seem suspect, even among those in red and black?"
(Hat tip: MaconDawg at dawgsports.com)
1
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:02 pm to DanBobUGA
The AJC had some similar commentary on how Adams might have been pandering to certain members of the fan base as a way to assuage the guilt from his prior transgressions - It's no secret that the man is generally despised among the older alumni so I wouldn't put it past him.
The argument about "whining" and "cry babies" is :beatdeadhorse:
Not like anyone's opinion on that is going to change any time soon.
The argument about "whining" and "cry babies" is :beatdeadhorse:
Not like anyone's opinion on that is going to change any time soon.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News