Started By
Message

re: Burrow sucks more than the Browns

Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:27 am to
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27795 posts
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:27 am to
quote:

Well if that was the case, the Bengals have been around more than last season so your math is still wrong


Ok. I meant to put “2019 Bengals”

quote:

See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?


You still don’t get it. This would be an issue if I had made any conclusions. I didn’t. I’m just listing straight facts.

It’s impossible for math to be idiotic. It’s either true or not.

The conclusions you form from math can be idiotic, but not the math itself. I never even came up with any conclusions so there’s really nothing to complain about.

Posted by Tigas96
Member since Mar 2019
241 posts
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:28 am to
Well that was on you for not saying 2019 Bengals vs 2020 bengals SO FAR. Bengals without Burrow has a win percentage over .400. Learn how to do math or learn how to label your data.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter