re: Burrow sucks more than the Browns

quote:

---

It is when he tried to compare two uneven sample sizes is where he screwed himself

---

First of all, I didn’t.

Second, even if I did, that’s how math works. It’s a small sample size, but it doesn’t make it any less true. 0/1=0/100.

It would be different if I had drawn conclusions from the data.

If I had listed the win percentages and then said that the data meant that the Bengals were better off without Burrow, that would be analytically invalid and disingenuous, but the mathematical validity does not change.