Started By
Message
re: Burrow sucks more than the Browns
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:05 am to diddlydawg7
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:05 am to diddlydawg7
What does your pea size brain not get by you comparing a percentage of 12 games to 2 games?? Also no I meant what I said...arbitrary. Bengals also lost their first two games of last season.
Here let me give you a scenario, I throw the football 1 time and complete the pass. I am 1/1. I am throwing 100%. Next day I throw 70 passes and complete 68. I am throwing about 97%. Do you see how more data gives you a more accurate reading or will you only portray data that fits your agenda kind of like this world is turning into?
Here let me give you a scenario, I throw the football 1 time and complete the pass. I am 1/1. I am throwing 100%. Next day I throw 70 passes and complete 68. I am throwing about 97%. Do you see how more data gives you a more accurate reading or will you only portray data that fits your agenda kind of like this world is turning into?
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:16 am to Tigas96
quote:
What does your pea size brain not get by you comparing a percentage of 12 games to 2 games
Bengals WP without Burrow: 0.125
Bengals WP with Burrow: 0.000
Your problem is that you are assuming that I compared the data and drew conclusions from the data. I didn’t. I listed the data so everyone can make their own conclusions based on the information at hand. Everyone knows that we’ve only played two games in 2020 but it doesn’t change the fact that their winning percentage is 0.
You are getting really upset about me providing information for everyone. You should really stop and think about what you are saying before you let the emotions get the better of you and resort to name-calling and anger.
quote:
Do you see how more data gives you a more accurate reading
It does. But I’m only listing the data we have at hand
Try not to be so angry over facts.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News