quote:
You don’t know the “unconfirmed” number of cases either yet you continually throw out these statistics as if they are remotely facts. There has never been a study that suggests anything other than certain urban areas like New York have had a higher infection rate than previously tested. That same New York antibody test showed that once testing ventured outside the city, positive antibody rates decreased drastically. To suggest that it’s vastly more widespread throughout the nation and that most are immune to it is nonsense. Just because you have the antibodies doesn’t mean you are immune and just because you don’t have them doesn’t mean you wouldn’t be immune for having not contacted it yet. Therefore your “80%” statistic is irrelevant when determining mortality rates or any rate for that matter because there are dozens of cases of individuals getting the virus more than once after remission.

The biggest breakdown yet of novel coronavirus cases suggests that 80% are mild. Some patients never show symptoms.

Date: Feb 19, 2020.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Rip Torn

Member since Mar 2020

2309 posts

Posted on 5/13/20 at 11:42 am to 3down10

Good gosh almighty you took that article to mean that the actual reported number of cases is 80% higher than the actual number reported?? Simply because 80% of individuals tested in China showed mild symptoms doesn’t equal cases being 80% higher than reported. You do understand that not everyone being tested shows symptoms? As a matter of fact, the vast majority of those being tested have had mild to no symptoms and yet they are and have been counted in the overall statistics. Of the 2.46 million active cases in the World, 2.41 million are mild to no symptoms. You continually try to undermine the seriousness of the virus and throw around these numbers that bring the mortality rate down to fit your “non political” agenda. I look forward to your illogical arguments

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board