Started By
Message
re: Conference expansion?
Posted on 1/2/20 at 4:07 pm to robstuckinbama
Posted on 1/2/20 at 4:07 pm to robstuckinbama
I'm not a fan of dumping anyone. But if you had to do it, it would be the double dip states. Obviously not Auburn or Alabama as both move the needle more than enough to consider. Don't really see the need for 2 Mississippi and 2 Tennessee schools. So if a had drop teams, I guess Vandy and whoever is less valuable of the Mississippi schools.
Only big markets need to apply, someone from North Carolina or Virginia would make sense. Oklahoma market wouldn't make much sense to me. Only reason to do this would be $.
Only big markets need to apply, someone from North Carolina or Virginia would make sense. Oklahoma market wouldn't make much sense to me. Only reason to do this would be $.
3
Posted on 1/2/20 at 4:14 pm to Ole Ag
Yes money is the only driver to expand the conference.
Football wise it’s not appealing. We already have several conference matchups that almost never happen. Why have a conference when you don’t play several teams for years?
Football wise it’s not appealing. We already have several conference matchups that almost never happen. Why have a conference when you don’t play several teams for years?
Posted on 1/2/20 at 5:14 pm to Ole Ag
Hey Aggie. It’s a good thing there are current no plans to dump anyone. If there were I expect A&M and Missouri would be shown the door. Neither of you is a true southeastern school and add little to the conference.
Posted on 1/2/20 at 5:21 pm to Ole Ag
What about the ACC (Fla. - 2, VA - 2, NC - 4)?
This post was edited on 1/2/20 at 5:22 pm
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News