Started By
Message
No matter what teams you think about adding or replacing in the SEC
Posted on 12/27/19 at 11:23 am
Posted on 12/27/19 at 11:23 am
There will always be a bottom and top half unless they all finish 6-6 and that would do the conference much harm. I see all these "we should replace Vanderbilt, Missouri, and others and get stronger teams...well....stronger teams could mean less wins for your program. This conference is well balanced and sometimes a team or two will rise up and make some noise but we will always have the 0-8..1-7...2-6 teams to go with the 8-0..7-1..and 6-2 teams. It's not going to change a great deal by adding stronger programs....status quo is pretty good for now. If it ain't broke...don't fix it.
This post was edited on 12/27/19 at 11:24 am
4
Posted on 12/27/19 at 11:38 am to jumpstart
I would rather get rid of at least two and not add any more.
Posted on 12/27/19 at 11:40 am to jumpstart
You're gonna run aggie back to the Big 12 with talk like that.
...I'll allow it.
...I'll allow it.
Posted on 12/27/19 at 11:41 am to jumpstart
quote:
There will always be a bottom and top half
We know Mizzou will always occupy that bottom spot
This post was edited on 12/27/19 at 11:42 am
Posted on 12/27/19 at 12:34 pm to nes2010
You guys didn't believe me when I said it in the other thread. This is one of those boomer comments I was referring to.
SCROOSTER
SCROOSTER
Posted on 12/27/19 at 12:43 pm to jumpstart
Thanks for holding up y’all’s part of the bottoms half 
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News